<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vacations, upgrades&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/</link>
	<description>Technology news and commentary by the TechSpot.com staff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 03:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didou</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Didou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lazy bum. :-p]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lazy bum. :-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Future proof? Ahh, I never believe those arguments :) In cases like that I just recall the Geforce 256&#039;s T&amp;L unit. By the time T&amp;L was widely used it was useless. I know it&#039;s not exactly a 100% fair comparison but at least this way I&#039;ll not have to upgrade the motherboard either ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Future proof? Ahh, I never believe those arguments :) In cases like that I just recall the Geforce 256&#8242;s T&amp;L unit. By the time T&amp;L was widely used it was useless. I know it&#8217;s not exactly a 100% fair comparison but at least this way I&#8217;ll not have to upgrade the motherboard either ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didou</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Didou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant &quot;not very useful right now&quot;. ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant &#8220;not very useful right now&#8221;. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Didou</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Didou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 64bit portion is now very useful right now but it has so much more that you can enjoy out of the box that it would be a shame to overlook it.

Cool&#039;n&#039;quiet make it much more silent (&amp; cooler), the performance compared to an AthlonXP (even with the same clock &amp; ram speed) is so much better. It just happens to be more futur proof as when a proper 64-bit OS is ready (with drivers, etc.) it will only get better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 64bit portion is now very useful right now but it has so much more that you can enjoy out of the box that it would be a shame to overlook it.</p>
<p>Cool&#8217;n'quiet make it much more silent (&amp; cooler), the performance compared to an AthlonXP (even with the same clock &amp; ram speed) is so much better. It just happens to be more futur proof as when a proper 64-bit OS is ready (with drivers, etc.) it will only get better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I went for the 1GB RAM after all - 2x512MB DDR PC3200. The current 768MB&#039;s a mix of PC2700/2400 so might as well just ditch the old mix altogether. Hopefully upgrading to a Barton XP after christmas.

64Bit might be all the rage at the moment but lets face it; how useful is it really for most people? I can&#039;t speak for everyone of course but the potential native 64Bit application I&#039;d be able to use would be Far Cry so far. Who knows, maybe if Microsoft starts offering reduced price 64bit products I might get something better (Office 64bit, Microsoft published games, etc.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I went for the 1GB RAM after all &#8211; 2x512MB DDR PC3200. The current 768MB&#8217;s a mix of PC2700/2400 so might as well just ditch the old mix altogether. Hopefully upgrading to a Barton XP after christmas.</p>
<p>64Bit might be all the rage at the moment but lets face it; how useful is it really for most people? I can&#8217;t speak for everyone of course but the potential native 64Bit application I&#8217;d be able to use would be Far Cry so far. Who knows, maybe if Microsoft starts offering reduced price 64bit products I might get something better (Office 64bit, Microsoft published games, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/43/43/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 09:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/43/43/#comment-200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It figures don&#039;t it? Since finishing there&#039;s been 2 or 3 articles posted covering the XP Prefetching &amp; a few related misinformed options.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It figures don&#8217;t it? Since finishing there&#8217;s been 2 or 3 articles posted covering the XP Prefetching &amp; a few related misinformed options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
