<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Mini experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/</link>
	<description>Technology news and commentary by the TechSpot.com staff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/5/mac-mini-experiment/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>i am a imac g5 user and i have seen alot of the new tiger systems if u look at the smoothness of the video and how much better the vision on it is as well all so that ur runing not just the apps u see but the on all ones u can see this by going application/utilities and open activity monitor u will see theres more then xp running and keeping the system safe and how many virus do u get on pc compaired to mac and macs need lower speed as the other half of the power is going to speeding up the system makeing it more powerfull and run better then a pc at one point my xp pc was dieing runing the same things my ibook g3 was running and my ibook g3 was running smoother as well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am a imac g5 user and i have seen alot of the new tiger systems if u look at the smoothness of the video and how much better the vision on it is as well all so that ur runing not just the apps u see but the on all ones u can see this by going application/utilities and open activity monitor u will see theres more then xp running and keeping the system safe and how many virus do u get on pc compaired to mac and macs need lower speed as the other half of the power is going to speeding up the system makeing it more powerfull and run better then a pc at one point my xp pc was dieing runing the same things my ibook g3 was running and my ibook g3 was running smoother as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrobTech</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrobTech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 22:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/5/mac-mini-experiment/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Reminder &quot;Mac is far better than PC&quot;

You should take a little flight through the FileSystem of the UNIX stuff on your Mac. You need a little knowledge of course.. ( so you can use the Terminal window correctly )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminder &#8220;Mac is far better than PC&#8221;</p>
<p>You should take a little flight through the FileSystem of the UNIX stuff on your Mac. You need a little knowledge of course.. ( so you can use the Terminal window correctly )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Discconected</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Discconected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 08:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/5/mac-mini-experiment/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>ur right windows is better a multi-tasking then mac but aso theres a diff in the clock speed:mac low windows high:p but if they switch to intel thenit will be a better to compare...:a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur right windows is better a multi-tasking then mac but aso theres a diff in the clock speed:mac low windows high:p but if they switch to intel thenit will be a better to compare&#8230;:a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/5/mac-mini-experiment/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>If I find good use for this Mac I will probably expand its memory. If it wouldn&#039;t be for Mini&#039;s low price tag (compared to the rest of Macs at least) I probably wouldn&#039;t have given it a try at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I find good use for this Mac I will probably expand its memory. If it wouldn&#8217;t be for Mini&#8217;s low price tag (compared to the rest of Macs at least) I probably wouldn&#8217;t have given it a try at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Burgess</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/5/mac-mini-experiment/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/5/mac-mini-experiment/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true - Mac OSX uses tons more resources than Windows XP. But OSX is also ever-evolving, where XP hasn&#039;t changed much over the past 4 years.

1GB or not at all, I say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true &#8211; Mac OSX uses tons more resources than Windows XP. But OSX is also ever-evolving, where XP hasn&#8217;t changed much over the past 4 years.</p>
<p>1GB or not at all, I say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

