<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Myths Debunked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techspot.com/blog/51/firefox-myths-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/51/firefox-myths-debunked/</link>
	<description>Technology news and commentary by the TechSpot.com staff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo quan scham</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/51/firefox-myths-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>foo quan scham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/51/firefox-myths-debunked/#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>the person who made the myth site doesn&#039;t even know what a non-profit organization is.  

he claims that its a &quot;myth&quot; that Mozilla is not-for-profit because they make millions in revenue...   this is smoke and mirrors.  most non-profits have revenue.  revenue doesn&#039;t mean they make profit, it means they make money to pay their employees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the person who made the myth site doesn&#8217;t even know what a non-profit organization is.  </p>
<p>he claims that its a &#8220;myth&#8221; that Mozilla is not-for-profit because they make millions in revenue&#8230;   this is smoke and mirrors.  most non-profits have revenue.  revenue doesn&#8217;t mean they make profit, it means they make money to pay their employees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/51/firefox-myths-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/51/firefox-myths-debunked/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>That may be so, but if you&#039;re stating Opera is the most secure browser as it has the least amount of unpatched vulnerabilities then you&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That may be so, but if you&#8217;re stating Opera is the most secure browser as it has the least amount of unpatched vulnerabilities then you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sngx1275</title>
		<link>http://www.techspot.com/blog/51/firefox-myths-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>sngx1275</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techspot.com/staff/51/firefox-myths-debunked/#comment-578</guid>
		<description>Lynx may be the most secure if you want to get technical.  But anyone that uses that as their main browser is not one I&#039;d take very serious when discussing browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynx may be the most secure if you want to get technical.  But anyone that uses that as their main browser is not one I&#8217;d take very serious when discussing browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

