TechSpot

amd 64 3500+ venice vs 3700+ san diego

By deano3041
Jul 26, 2005
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ok heres my delema i kno the 3500+ with a venice core is a great cpu for 267$ but now i see the 3700+ with a san diego core is only 323$ a 56$ difference which should not be too terrible of a problem for me.........now the san diego cores are suppoesdly better not to mention the 3700 has a 1 MB L2 cache as apposed to a 512 KB cache for the 3500+ is it really worth it to purchase the 3700+ over the 3500+???? by the way i will be doing mostly gaming on this PC and yes i already have a great graphics card (hopefully HIS Hightech x800xl)

    thanx for your opinions and any links to comparason charts or hype for either chip would be much appreciated
  2. drew8808

    drew8808 TS Rookie

    hmm sounds good to me

    cheaper + better = buy that sh!% :approve:
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...


Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.