What a strange review.I read another review and the R9 285 beat out the GTX760 easily in most tests at 2560X1440 which is the opposite to these findings. I wonder though what all the fuss is about at these resolutions as 95% of the computer population will not be operating at these resolutions.
So you read one other review that you say was different to ours and your conclusion is that ours is strange. Can you please link to this other non-strange review for us?
The R9 285 was on average 7% faster than the GTX 760 and that is fact.
It makes little difference if you compare these cards at 1920x1200 or 2560x1600, the margins are much the same.
According to Steam just 1% of all gamers run at 2560x1600/2560x1440 so 99% of the population doesn’t run at that resolution, 95% wasn’t a bad guess though That said 26% now run at 3840x1050 which is virtually the same amount of pixels as 2560x1600.
Oh frame rates where on Tomb Raider R9 285 were 55 GTX760 was 47 ?
I just know you have a point here, I just don't know what it is.