Brek01
Posts: 11 +2
Err, bad directing is killing movie culture. The movie was bad, it does not matter how much it cost to make or the talent of the crew. If the director is not doing his job the whole thing breaks down.
The Dawn of Justice score was of particular annoyance to Ratner. It cost $250 million and grossed nearly $900 million worldwide, yet has a Tomatoes rating of just 27 percent.
If I screw up making a cake and its ugly but it tastes really good, how are you going to rate it?If he made a good movie, it would be reflected there
Some people will rate it very high, others will not.
If a car goes real fast but it looks like sh!t, how are you going to rate it?
Some people will rate it very high, others will not.
There is a lost common ground on what makes a good movie. It doesn't have to be executed perfectly to be enjoyable or even great. Batman V Superman has near a 65% approval rating for average consumers...people liked it overall and it made 900 million. Critics are upset because many aspects of the film could have been done better. The RT's score is based on executional issues but it's pretty obvious people enjoyed it.
Listen I am not saying BvS should be at a 90%, but its enjoyability score is much higher then its execution score, thing is, which one factors more into your score?
The Fifth Element has a 71%... that movie IMO should be in the 90's.
I`m watching, like, 10 movies per week. Its my biggest passion at this point of my life. I couldnt care less about scores on imDB/Rotten Tomatoes, yes, I think that I understand art of cinematography better than most people so I cant value average score voted by average people who watch movies about comic book heroes. Thats not even cinema anymore. Found many great gems who score like, 5.1 on imDB who are better than all Betmens and Spidermens put together.
lol.... the problem is, people are generally not that bright...I've read some of Rotten Tomato's scores and reviews. He has a point. There should be a minimum IQ level to be able to post on that website and give a score.
Think of someone you know who is of "average intelligence"... they're pretty dumb, aren't they? Now... realize that half of the world is DUMBER than that person.... scary, isn't it!
One should not judge a movie by what others say. If one is interested in the subject if the movie, one should watch it and judge it.
That's why B vs. S grossed so highly, people didn't judge and actually gave it a chance. It was still cr@p.
Unfortunately yes, I wasted £20 and 3 hours of my life.I guess you were one of them who gave it a chance too.
Trouble is you can't put brains into statues.I've read some of Rotten Tomato's scores and reviews. He has a point. There should be a minimum IQ level to be able to post on that website and give a score.
It wasn't utter garbage, for the budget and Batman/Theme, it wasn't the best compared to Iron Man, Avengers, Spiderman etc... but compare it to High School Musical 1,2,3 and it's a masterpiece.If he made a good movie, it would be reflected there. That movie was utter garbage and couple that with the fact that nowadays a movie ticket can cost upwards of $20, it better be worth my money!