BBC investigation claims Apple is breaking its promise to protect Chinese factory workers

Jos

Posts: 3,073   +97
Staff

Apple has been under scrutiny over labor conditions at its suppliers’ manufacturing facilities overseas. But while the company has taken steps to keep things in check, an undercover BBC Panorama investigation claims Apple's promises to protect workers were routinely broken.

The report cites a number of workplace violations relating to workers' hours, ID cards, dormitories, work meetings and juvenile workers at Pegatron, which employs over a million Chinese workers to make devices like the iPhone 6. 

One undercover reporter claimed they were made to work 18 days in a row despite asking repeatedly for time off, while others said they had to work shifts of up to 16 hours and sleep in cramped dormitories. Apple’s supplier agreement stipulates a 55-hour weekly maximum work hours. 

Moreover some workers are reportedly asked to attend meetings outside of regular working hours for which they get no compensation, and others are being forced to do overtime when such work is supposed to be voluntary.

The full investigation will air tonight in a BBC One special titled Apple’s Broken Promises, and will cover other worrying details such as evidence of children working in dangerous conditions on the Indonesian island of Bangka, where tin from illegal mines could be entering its supply chain.

The latter is a complex issue which Apple itself has acknowledged. The company has already teamed up with other technology firms on creating an  Indonesian Tin Working Group, and seeking to implement a system to hold tin smelters accountable. But with little to no intervention from the local government and widespread corruption these changes take time.

Apple senior vice president of operations Jeff Williams countered the report saying that they do more than any other company to protect working conditions, and that its suppliers have achieved an average of 93% compliance with the workweek limit. "We can still do better. And we will," he said.

Below is the memo sent to employees in the U.K. in response to the report:

UK Team,

As you know, Apple is dedicated to the advancement of human rights and equality around the world. We are honest about the challenges we face and we work hard to make sure that people who make our products are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.

Last night, the BBC’s Panorama program called those values into question. Like many of you, Tim and I were deeply offended by the suggestion that Apple would break a promise to the workers in our supply chain or mislead our customers in any way.

I’d like to give you facts and perspective, all of which we shared with the BBC in advance, but were clearly missing from their program.

Panorama showed some of the shocking conditions around tin mining in Indonesia. Apple has publicly stated that tin from Indonesia ends up in our products, and some of that tin likely comes from illegal mines. Here are the facts:

Tens of thousands of artisanal miners are selling tin through many middlemen to the smelters who supply to component suppliers who sell to the world. The government is not addressing the issue, and there is widespread corruption in the undeveloped supply chain. Our team visited the same parts of Indonesia visited by the BBC, and of course we are appalled by what’s going on there.

Apple has two choices: We could make sure all of our suppliers buy tin from smelters outside of Indonesia, which would probably be the easiest thing for us to do and would certainly shield us from criticism. But it would be the lazy and cowardly path, because it would do nothing to improve the situation for Indonesian workers or the environment since Apple consumes a tiny fraction of the tin mined there. We chose the second path, which is to stay engaged and try to drive a collective solution.

We spearheaded the creation of an Indonesian Tin Working Group with other technology companies. Apple is pushing to find and implement a system that holds smelters accountable so we can influence artisanal mining in Indonesia. It could be an approach such as “bagging and tagging” legally mined material, which has been successful over time in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. We are looking to drive similar results in Indonesia, which is the right thing to do.

Panorama also made claims about our commitment to working conditions in our factories. We know of no other company doing as much as Apple does to ensure fair and safe working conditions, to discover and investigate problems, to fix and follow through when issues arise, and to provide transparency into the operations of our suppliers.

I want you to know that more than 1400 of your Apple coworkers are stationed in China to manage our manufacturing operations. They are in the factories constantly — talented engineers and managers who are also compassionate people, trained to speak up when they see safety risks or mistreatment. We also have a team of experts dedicated solely to driving compliance with ourSupplier Code of Conductacross our vast supply chain.

In 2014 alone, our Supplier Responsibility team completed 630 comprehensive, in-person audits deep into our supply chain. These audits include face-to-face interviews with workers, away from their managers, in their native language. Sometimes critics point to the discovery of problems as evidence that the process isn’t working. The reality is that we find violations in every audit we have ever performed, no matter how sophisticated the company we're auditing. We find problems, we drive improvement, and then we raise the bar.

Panorama’s report implied that Apple isn’t improving working conditions. Let me tell you, nothing could be further from the truth. Here are just a few examples:

Several years ago, the vast majority of workers in our supply chain worked in excess of 60 hours, and 70+ hour workweeks were typical. After years of slow progress and industry excuses, Apple decided to attack the problem by tracking the weekly hours of over one million workers, driving corrective actions with our suppliers and publishing the results on our website monthly — something no other company had ever done. It takes substantial effort, and we have to weed out false reporting, but it's working. This year, our suppliers have achieved an average of 93% compliance with our 60-hour limit. We can still do better. And we will.

Our auditors were the first to identify and crack down on a ring of unscrupulous labor brokers who were holding workers’ passports and forcing them to pay exorbitant fees. To date, we have helped workers recoup $20 million in excessive payments like these.

We’ve gone far beyond auditing and corrective actions by creating educational programs for workers in the same facilities where they make our products. More than 750,000 people have taken advantage of these college-level courses and enrichment programs, and the feedback we get from students is inspiring.

I will not dive into every issue raised by Panorama in this note, but you can rest assured that we take all allegations seriously, and we investigate every claim. We know there are a lot of issues out there, and our work is never done. We will not rest until every person in our supply chain is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve.

If you’d like to learn more about our Supplier Responsibility program, I encourage you and our customers to visit our website at apple.com/supplier responsibility.

Thanks for your time and your support.

Jeff

Permalink to story.

 
It's a sad state of affairs and I don't see Apple being able to sweep it under the rug in a hurry as they'd like to.
 
Human rights be damned as long as there are enough iPhones for the people camping outside the Apple Store
 
Poor excuse, IMHO, "we do more than any other company." In other words, "we want to appear to the world like we are the best company in the world. It is our damage control because we know full well that we are still trampling all over the people who build our products for us."
 
I usually hate apple but these are NOT apples employees, this is not Apple's factory. Just because they assemble apple products, does not mean they are employees of apple. If I hire a contractor to build my house, it's not my job to look after the builders! This is NOT apples responsibility. Apple has NO authority in the factory or over the people who run it.
 
I by no means am making any excuses for Apple, but I suspect this is standard corporate policy for the majority. People and the future be damned if they stand in the way of immediate profit. But it has ever been thus, just a matter of degree.
 
I like the "we could by from someone outside of xxxxxxxx but that would do nothing to help the people in that country....yeah right...should say we could buy outside of that country, but it would cost more.
 
I usually hate apple but these are NOT apples employees, this is not Apple's factory. Just because they assemble apple products, does not mean they are employees of apple. If I hire a contractor to build my house, it's not my job to look after the builders! This is NOT apples responsibility. Apple has NO authority in the factory or over the people who run it.
no, but apple is helping other people make billions of dollars off slave labor. They can say "look, stop this **** or we will take our business elsewhere". They do not do this and in my mind that's as bad as condoning it.
 
Last edited:
The BBC has absolutely no right to be moralistic. It is funded by the British taxpayer under an antiquated system of charging for a "TV licence." If you don't pay you can go to prison! It makes multi-millions in profits, all at taxpayers expense and where does the money go? It falsely reported and lied about the destruction of building 7 in the 911 debacle minutes before it was destroyed even though no plane hit it, how does that work exactly, psychic news reporting? It spews political propaganda on its news channels the likes of which Josef Goebbels would have been proud of. Granted, it does make some excellent programs but when you have a bottomless pit of money to go at then so they should!! Despicable organisation as corrupt as all the other corporations that like to 'think' they control the world. Yes I'm British!
 
The BBC has absolutely no right to be moralistic. It is funded by the British taxpayer under an antiquated system of charging for a "TV licence." If you don't pay you can go to prison! It makes multi-millions in profits, all at taxpayers expense and where does the money go? It falsely reported and lied about the destruction of building 7 in the 911 debacle minutes before it was destroyed even though no plane hit it, how does that work exactly, psychic news reporting? It spews political propaganda on its news channels the likes of which Josef Goebbels would have been proud of. Granted, it does make some excellent programs but when you have a bottomless pit of money to go at then so they should!! Despicable organisation as corrupt as all the other corporations that like to 'think' they control the world. Yes I'm British!

What I got out of this post is "We should ignore that apple is violating human rights because the BBC is laundering money"
 
It's one thing to sub-contract work to another company, it is quite another when Apple takes credit for improved conditions when there are none. Looking at the profit margin for Apple, they could easily enforce humane standards while making a very successful profit margin but what is not well known is the influence of the government on these conditions. It may be entirely out of Apples relm of control, but if that were the case they should not be making false claims of good conditions.
 
"Apple decided to attack the problem by tracking the weekly hours of over one million workers, driving corrective actions with our suppliers and publishing the results on our website monthly"

How the hell do you do that when most of the overtime isn't "official"? On paper they are under the limit, in reality they are forced to worked overtime or they get fired.
 
The BBC are just as corrupt. Bleeting on about human rights but supporting a government who want to remove the human rights act from britain all together. And censoring anyone and anything that they feel disagrees with their agenda. Impartial is not a word in their vocabulary these days.

Please take everything you see on the BBC with a pinch of salt, Or better still get your news from a better source.
 
The BBC are just as corrupt. Bleeting on about human rights but supporting a government who want to remove the human rights act from britain all together. And censoring anyone and anything that they feel disagrees with their agenda. Impartial is not a word in their vocabulary these days.

Please take everything you see on the BBC with a pinch of salt, Or better still get your news from a better source.
You mean like Sky News? Don't make me laugh.
 
I usually hate apple but these are NOT apples employees, this is not Apple's factory. Just because they assemble apple products, does not mean they are employees of apple. If I hire a contractor to build my house, it's not my job to look after the builders! This is NOT apples responsibility. Apple has NO authority in the factory or over the people who run it.
You didn't read Apple's memo sent out, didn't you? It is Apple's responsibility as they admit it.
 
Back