Celebrities threaten Google with $100M lawsuit for failing to remove hacked nude images

Google has taken little or no action to stop these outrageous violations.. Can Google sue them back? because all of these outrageous violations caused by their own stu-pidity taking their own nude pictures

The only violation is that the users took their own pics and got hacked. What does Google have anything to do with iCloud? Google is a search engine that get's you to them, like any other porn that exists in the marketplace. Celebs should take it as free publicity and move on.
 
I read as much as I could of everyones comments, but:

To the... B list celebs that includes those ugly images of Jlaw with spaff on her face, you can't sue google. Why the f**k do you actually think, that GOOGLE, is the LAW of the INTERNET.
This is the whole problem, how come they are not suing all search engines then ?
Apples icloud. Apples fault.
But see, Apple, overpriced crap that rich n famous and all wanna be chavs buy. Google is for the rest. And thus it must be Googles fault. With its bottom feeder customer base.
Like someone earlier said this rich and douchous think they deserve special treatment. They need special ed. Cause they know nothing about the technology they use.
 
"The only violation is that the users took their own pics and got hacked. What does Google have anything to do with iCloud? Google is a search engine that get's you to them, like any other porn that exists in the marketplace. Celebs should take it as free publicity and move on."

sorry, my mistake, but there's a typo from my comment, it should be:
"Celebs threatens Google because (they think) Google has taken little or no action to stop these outrageous violations. So, I mean can Google sue them back? Because all of these outrageous violations caused by their (celebs) own stu-pidity taking their own nude pictures"

LoL
 
The only violation is that the users took their own pics and got hacked. What does Google have anything to do with iCloud? Google is a search engine that get's you to them, like any other porn that exists in the marketplace. Celebs should take it as free publicity and move on.
Actually, I agree with all you've said, but you've left out a couple of very important points.

The celebrity lawsuit, is a contrived continuation of the free publicity garnered by the hacking. So, henceforth, all you'll hear about is "the lawsuit over NUDE photos". In other words, you never have to retake nude photos, you can cruise on the notoriety of first set for months, if not years.

"Today, celebrities violated by the NUDE photo hacking of the iCloud, filed a motion for the court to remove those photos". Tomorrow it will be another frivolous motion, with the same widespread press coverage. And, "the beat goes on".

We, and everybody else watching this "carnival" unfold, should be god damned grateful that Google HASN'T pulled those links. If that were to happen, then web censorship would get a big, big, boost from those seeking publicity by manipulating that very same web for their own publicity!

And FWIW, "carnival" is the proper term for this annoying supercilious nonsense:

To wit from Google: mid 16th century: from Italian carnevale, carnovale, from medieval Latin carnelevamen, carnelevarium ‘Shrovetide,’ from Latin caro, carn- ‘flesh’ + levare ‘put away.’
 
Why are they going after Google when it was their Apple account that was hacked? I would have never even known about the photos if not for the media and I could not find the pics online in Google search, I torrented them to see what all the media was talking about and I found the link in a Yahoo news report on the subject. They should go after the media because no one would have even known the pics were out there if the news outlets did not report about it 50million times since it happened.
 
I keep forgetting that rich & famous people deserve privileged treatment far and above what everyone else does.

How silly of me.

Privilege has nothing to do with it. Buy yourself a high-dollar lawyer and you can cause all the same noise these chicks do. Not being able to afford one isn't privilege, it's economics.
But having the money for them makes you rich and being rich does make you privileged since you can get away with and do things others cannot. Money gives you the ability to get away with things, it does make you privileged.
 
"Privilege has nothing to do with it. Buy yourself a high-dollar lawyer and you can cause all the same noise these chicks do. Not being able to afford one isn't privilege, it's economics."

Not privileged? In the eyes of the law, everyone is supposed to be treated as equals. Ever heard of equality? You literally just gave the very reason as to why the ARE privileged. Money. The founding fathers did NOT intend for courts to be ran by money. They intended them to be ran by the People. Obviously, corruption has changed things along with the ignorance to allow it to happen. So in a practical way you are right, it is just economics now... but they are still privileged because that's not how the law was intended to be used. So unless every high-dollar lawyer decides to start working for the masses, anyone that can afford them otherwise IS PRIVILEGED. Or they get to CHEAT. Or the do not always have to answer to their unlawful acts. Or they can use the law to their advantage, ect word it how you want. The only thing they aren't privileged to... IS OTHER HIGH-DOLLAR LAWYERS. Like the ones Google can afford. Money talks. Not so much always your rights.

Maybe when the high-end dollar lawyers no longer exist THEN we can say those that can afford them are no longer privileged with the law.
 
LMFAO

They aren't privileged because they can afford expensive lawyers!

... Oh, wait....

-_-

HERP DERP
 
Back