DDR2-800 Vs DDR3-1333...Why is DDR3 No Faster

Rilla927 · Aug 17, 2007

Today we look at why DDR3 memory has provided us with no noticeable performance gains over existing DDR2 memory. The reasoning is quite simple really and it has to do with the Core 2 Duo processors lack of need for memory faster than 800MHz. The article investigates this in a little more detail and looks to the future, when DDR3 will become an important memory standard.

Over the past few months we have published quite a few DDR2 memory related articles that looked at how timings, frequency and capacity influence the performance of Intel’s Core 2 Duo processors. The results did not really surprise us, though many of the readers did seem shocked by our findings. First of all memory timings (latency) make very little difference, as CAS 3-3-3-8 T1 delivered just 5% more memory bandwidth at 800MHz when compared to CAS6-6-6-18 T2 timings. In almost all games this made near no difference, particularly at higher resolutions such as 1920x1200. So memory timings are somewhat irrelevant for Core 2 Duo systems then.

http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=674

Julio Franco · Aug 18, 2007

This article comes from our associate editor's own website Legion Hardware

TechSpot

Welcome to TechSpot

DDR2-800 Vs DDR3-1333...Why is DDR3 No Faster

Rilla927 Newcomer, in training Posts: 180

Julio Franco TechSpot Editor Posts: 6,055 +121

Add New Comment

	Social Login & Guest Posting			TechSpot Members Login here or sign up for free, it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.