Thanks for the website tip!
An acceptable CPU temp would be anything below 50C IMO.
And do consider editing your previous posts instead of having three separate ones in a row cluttering up the thread.
What?! You don't have to be a jerk about how a person posts on this forum. I wouldn't have replied 3 separate time have I not received 3 separate posts! And considering that this "board" doesn't even allow you to delete a message, your statement is somewhat impossible.
Wow. I'm out of here. That's exactly the type of response I was telling someone earlier in this thread when they said I should start my own separate thread - instead of posting on someone else's that pertained to the same thing!
That was unwarranted. I just asked you to edit a post if you needed to add more info to it, nothing more. I wasn't pertaining too all your posts, just a general statement. You could have quoted and replied to all three people separately in one long post, and that is what a mod will probably do by merging your posts into a single long one.
Oh, and you're welcome, *******.
Yeah, and you got some nerve telling me how to edit when you posted over 4,000+ messages in less than 3 years. Your reply was nothing more than a "good job" reply which is meaningless, IMO. It had nothing to do with original post, so please, save your opinions on how one should edit their posts for yourself.
I don't know where this started or why, nor do I want to start a war. But I back Rage_3K_Moiz and TMagic650... two of the more gentlemenly and informed. In all his time on this forum, he has only been helpful. And an edit of posts actually gets one a better response, and happier results, so I am sure his suggestion was from the best of motives and helpfulness.
It does one no good to have only 23 posts, and attack a respected member with over 4100, when he was merely suggesting a way to improve your responses. His suggestions are in the guides, so you might want to take a look at them as a way to improve this forum.
Sorry to have taken the time, is this is considered interferrence.