also @ TechSpot: Android 4.0: Tracking Ice Cream Sandwich's Availability on Smartphones

TechSpot

Downgrading OS XP to Win98se

Discussion in 'Windows OS' started by gbhall, Oct 15, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    Why do I want to do that? Real good reason! I support 40+ PC's all running Win98 networked via a Novell server. They all do the job great, but some are getting llllllooonnnggg in the tooth now. Just bought 4 replacements - Dell dimension 2400 at truly amazing price. I knew they would come with XP home and thought to simply install the Win98se from the retiring machines, because that is the best thing to do - don't want to spend more on the OS than the complete PC, don't want the hassle of supporting 2 OS's !

    Dell (and I can't blame them really) say we don't support that, machines tested only on XP.... etc. Fine, so I get what I hope are the correct drivers from Intel for the mobo and video, from Broadcom for the network, but so far, no joy, as there are conflicts between onboard video, 'APCI extender' and the network. All want to share same memory.

    I've not had time to delve into this much yet, and will not be able to until Monday 18th, but in the meantime, if anybody has suggestions - better yet, make that if anybody has DONE THIS BEFORE, just great, please get in touch...

    Thanks guys, David
  2. Phantasm66 Newcomer, in training

    Sorry if I am not understanding your post properly, but surely you can just use the Windows XP machines as Novell clients, the same as the Win98 machines? They can still talk to your Novell Server if you install the Windows XP Novell Client on them.
  3. Nodsu Newcomer, in training

    It would be even better idea to install the Novell Netware Client since the MS one.. Well, it's Microsoft and made to support a competing technology :p

    As for the Dell machines. Try playing around in BIOS with plug and play settings. Also, if possible tell the Dells that you are not using a PnP-aware OS and let BIOS manage all the hardware resources.

    Disable in BIOS all the peripherals you don't use to free up IRQs.
  4. Liquidlen TechSpot Paladin


    Phant... can you join a domain with XP Home by just loading Novell Client ?
  5. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    Thanks for the thoughts about MS or Novell clients. However I tried this a couple of years ago, Novell (at that time) said they will not support XP-home, only XP-pro, and this is because XP-home is deliberately crippled by MS to prevent exactly that. Your home network is restricted to 5 users, and lacks all sorts of software required by a 'standard' network client. Now that was some time ago - if I looked, I might well find some pirate client software, but I don't expect Novell to have changed their mind.

    Your comments about non-PNP OS are promising, however - will try Monday.
  6. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    continuing progress report....

    In case anyone follows this thread, I'm reporting some progress. No way would the onboard video of a Dell 2400 work properly in Win98se - it always reports conflicting memory usage with 'extended APIC...' on the motherboard. There seems to be no clear way to dumb-down the bios which works, so getting beyond VGA is not possible, although all the chipset drivers, Lan driver, US drivers and so on are fine. By the way, the post directing me to an unofficial Win98 service pack is great!

    I did look into using Novell client on WinXP-home, and as expected, you are advised this does not work; although you probably could get some sort of connection with Netware 6 and above, it might not be stable.

    To get the thing going in Win98, I found the solution is...install PCI video card (in this case two for dual-monitor working) and ignore the onboard video, which can be left with a VGA driver - strangely it cannot be disabled entirely. Remember this is a business machine, video performance is totally unimportant.

    Now I have started re-installing all the users applications - what a bind. I like the fact that this is an Intel chipset, and using the Intel chipset drivers causes the hardware layer to ALL be re-evaluated. So I'm going to try re-attaching the old hard drive into the new machine, forcing a re-install with this new driver set, and based on previous experience, I might be able to get the old hard drive up and running with new motherboard drivers. I can then simply image the old drive onto the new. Some may say this is ridiculous, but I've had it work before, and hey, does it save some time if it works!
  7. skeller555 Newcomer, in training

    Dell 2400 and win98

    Great!!! someone else is having the same problem as I. I too have an old Novell Server and run Dos Apps that prevent me from using XP. I bought the 4 Dells not realized what a pain it was to try to install Win98. For God sake, it is a basic Intel board. It shouldn't be a problem.

    Anyhow, I loaded all the drivers except the Video. Everything works fine except for that video.

    What video cards did you fine to replace it with. I tried an S3 but wasn't very successful. If you have futher notes on this I would appreciate it if you would post.

    Thanks!
  8. jstillion Newcomer, in training

    At our college we using windows xp and novel very well but I do understand having apples to apples systems, much easier to support.
  9. jstillion Newcomer, in training

    Here's another trick if your going to move the HD to another system.

    This will force windows 98 to re-detect everything from scratch:
    http://www.windowsreinstall.com/install/other/motherboard/win98me.htm

    I've had some success but would usually loss one device that the driver will not install at all. At work it was the on-board audio (IBM - Intel boards) would not take the correct driver nor would the sound work no matter what I did, other than that I've been able to get it to work for all other devices.
  10. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    Used

    The video cards I found worked fine are PCI cards, ATI wonder and such-like, about 4 years old, and very slow by todays standards, but in a business environment thats no problem whatever. You will know that Dell omitted the AGP slot, so only ISA cards can be added, and no way will the onboard AGP video work with any added cards, but I have twin monitors working fine.
  11. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    Forcing re-detection

    That URL could be a god-send !!! I will definitely study it and try various options. Would recommend that you first take a drive image onto the new machine twice - once to work with and the second to overwrite a failed attempt and try again. BTW I suspect your problem with not being able to get sound working is because there simply is not a correct driver available for Win98. Sound chips seem to be something independant of motherboard, and for instance Dell / IBM put what they like on an otherwise standard Intel board. I'll bet you any money if you installed Win98se from scratch you still would not be able to get sound working.....
  12. Goalie Newcomer, in training

    For the record, you can trick XP Home into thinking it's logged into a NT domain, and trick the domain into the same.

    However, it is not a full login and many services will not be available. What you have to do is get a tweak program and set the domain for autologin through that.

    When you go to access domain net shares, they will auto-authenticate as if you're logged into the domain. Roaming profiles, domain controlled setup, etc will not be available, and if I recall correctly there are some conditions in which the net share won't be available. This trick is particularly handy for those XP Home laptops that use Outlook.. you can get them to log in automatically, saving you a bit of time (I highly recommend Outlook 2003 for its cached exchange mode, btw, it cuts down much of the startup time because outlook doesn't freeze waiting for the login.)

    As far as the novell client goes.. MS's Novell client is indeed a pain, and I've heard words about it that a moderator wouldn't allow me to use. It does, however, log in. It can parse scirpts too, but I'd recommend uising Novell's client if at all possible. I'm just not all that familiar with either client- I've used them, but only one or two times a long long time ago.

    Since no one else has any manners here- a belated Welcome to Techspot gbhall! :wave:
  13. hmsrolst Newcomer, in training

    Hi, I'm having the same problem--conflicts with ACPI BIOS Extensions, and I've tried two PCI video cards--an ATI Rage XL and an Matrox Milleniium II--and they also have the same conflicts. If you could be more specific about which PCI cards you've had success with (and if there are any that haven't worked), I'd very much appreciate it.

    Thanks, Howard
  14. luvr Newcomer, in training

    Care to elaborate on this? Specifically, where can I find it?
    I'm trying to set up a multiboot system (Win98SE, Win2K, Linux), and enabling APIC extensions in BIOS consistently crashes Win98SE. Could that unofficial service pack help me in any way?
  15. hmsrolst Newcomer, in training

    I finally managed to get the onboard video to work in 98SE. I killed everything in the BIOS that I didn't need, e.g., serial ports, parallel port and sound (couldn't find drivers for the latter anyway, so I used a sound card) and then kept repeatedly manually configuring it until one time it finally didn't conflict. For the most part I didn't have crashes, just resource conflicts.

    I don't think you should have a problem with W2K--although I didn't try it, it looks like drivers for it are on the Dell site.

    Good luck.
  16. luvr Newcomer, in training

    Never mind... I found it - Googling for "win98 unofficial service pack" turned it up (must have made a typo the first time I tried it).
    Anyway, I tried the service pack, but it doesn't do any good for me: I still have to set the physical memory limit to 768MB (plus tweak max vcache size, or something of that style) - just as I had to do before I installed the pack.
  17. Charles Hammond Newcomer, in training

    Why order computers from someone who can not guarantee they will work with Win98? If that is what you want, just tell Dell you will take your business elsewhere. Dell is not that great of a supplier. If it takes hours and hours to make something work, did you really save any money?
  18. Phantasm66 Newcomer, in training

    Well, as regards Windows XP Pro....

    You can join a Novell one by doing that, yes. But as Nodsu said you can get the proper Novell Netware Client and install that, which will do the trick much better.

    You can of course join Windows 2000 or 2003 domains using XP's internal, built in technology. But if you want to join a Novell network then you can use either the bundled Novell client or the one from Novell's site, which is better. You certainly don't need to downgrade your Windows 2000 or XP to 98 just to use Novell - that's insane.

    Windows XP Home might not support the Novell Client - I dunno. XP home is just professional with some of the features turned off, so as long as it does not reject Home for some reason then it should be fine. I don't believe that XP Home can join a Windows 2000 or XP domain, though. I would upgrade XP Home to professional in this case, not 98. 98 is old technology now, and should not be used if at all possible because of the vast number of unfixed security problems.
  19. gbhall TechSpot Chancellor

    XP home on Novell network

    You are correct in your surmise - XP home does NOT support a Novell Client - except it's the other way round - Novell do not support XP home. There are many important bits of standard networking protocol missing, and although a genuine Novell client does supply all these for Win98, 2000 and XP pro, Novell by fiat from Microsoft, will not do so for XP home....

    As to the insanity of using Win98se instead, think about this - (a) XP pro would be needed, extra cost per PC £75 or so.... (b) some vital company software used by the accountants is a DOS-based program. Under Win2K and Win XP the colours are incorrectly rendered, the mouse does not work in a window, only full screen, plus keyboard and screen response is slow and jerky. This applies to all the different models of PC I have ever tried it on. In short, 2K and XP have been IMHO deliberately crippled by M$ so they work poorly or not at all..... (c) if I want to, I can build my own PCs from bits and use a perfectly-adequate client I have already paid for once, thanks a bunch Bill....



  20. HoopaJoop Newcomer, in training

    Guff

    I wouldn't expect dell to support a product that the manufacturer no longer supports.

    It doesn't. Not normally anyway. There may be a way as Goalie said.

    I'm not saying that microsoft's policies are good or nice. They are a quite harsh in their quest for higher fortunes. However, we need a bit of realism here. I hate to be the Devil's advocate, some would say literally, but:

    You have to remember that there are some radical changes to the OSs and filesystems between windows 98 and current tech.
    Windows, from 2000 on, is a native 32bit app. Windows 98 is a native 16 bit app still running on a DOS platform. The primary core of the 98 OS is still DOS. There was also a fundamental change in the filesystem. Of course you can run them with FAT32, but they are designed for NTFS. While NTFS has been around a while, NT5 saw some radical changes. LDAP, which Novell has been doing for some time now, is new to NT5 for windows if i'm not mistaken.

    They tried, albeit weakly, to help with compatibility in XP with application compatibility mode. I know it only sometimes works, but it is something. Something they didn't do in the transition to 2000.

    Yes you can build your own machines, but for most even small networks manageability is vitally important. If I have 100 machines and I need to roll out an image to them it is much easier to roll out to 100 identical machines. Also, when some of my clients break down, they are dells so they do, I can get warrantee work on it while I'm maintaining my servers and network. My time is better spent not tracing down hardware problems. If you're talking about the xp registration guff that isn't a problem with open license copies. Also, I know it's a pain, but if you can't activate your copy due to hardware changes you can call them to fix it. The activations don't stay in the database very long either. Something like 120 says. Sorry if I mistook your statement.

    The bottom line is that Microsoft is a profit driven company. They messed up with 95 by not embracing networking and the internet. They are now trying to recover from that mistake. I don't think they intentionally crippled it to work poorly with legacy apps. They just don't care enough. They have to constantly move forward or they stand the chance of becoming, or losing to, companies like Novell.

    Sorry for the long post.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.