Frostbite 3 engine detailed in latest teaser video

[Shawn Knight]

Battlefield 4 is still about four months away but that hasn’t stopped EA from releasing a number of trailers to showcase what the title has in store for gamers this holiday season. The latest sneak peek takes a closer look at the technology used to power the game, the Frostbite 3 engine.

A good bit of the footage shown in the embedded video below is recycled from earlier trailers but what’s new this time around is the commentary. Frostbite creative director Frank Vitz points out that the engine has been in development since 2006 as an evolutionary process.

One of the goals of Frostbite 3 was to create more dynamic and living environments. For example, game developers previously had to go through a lot of effort to give the impression of trees swaying in the wind. With the new engine, developers are given tools to create the tree but it’s left up to the game engine to animate the tree using wind.

Environmental destruction is also a core feature of the Frostbite engine and one big step forward is called levelution. This involves drastically altering a multiplayer map into something totally different. Examples given include a building collapsing or a dam breaking – anything that could be a big game-changer to a level.

Yet another new feature in Battlefield 4 is networked water simulation. It may sound complicated but basically it means that all players will see the same waves in the same position at the same time on water-based maps. This will no doubt provide an interesting dynamic when battling it out on the high seas.

We invite you to check out the video above for a complete look at what Frostbite 3 has to offer. I, for one, am really excited about what Battlefield 4 has to offer. What says you?

Permalink to story.

https://www.techspot.com/news/53026-frostbite-3-engine-detailed-in-latest-teaser-video.html

 

[TomSEA]

Impressive detail, dynamics and animations. Would (obviously) like to see more than 2 second clips though. Also some info on what type of machine it's going to take to run this at top settings.

 

[TheDevopsGuy]

A massive improvment the frostbite engine just keeps impressing me from game to game :O

 

[ReederOnTheRun]

That's what I like to hear, can't wait to see it more in-depth

 

[Chazz]

If a browser is required again they can count me out. I haven't played BF3 for months because of that + Origin. Atleast I have BFBC2.

 

[Jad Chaar]

I wish it was more like the Crysis 3 tech demo (long clips) like TomSEA said. I feel like it is Battlefield 3 with more effort put into the graphics and features. Too bad I will still buy it! I hate you EA xD.

 

[lawfer]

I wish it was more like the Crysis 3 tech demo (long clips) like TomSEA said. I feel like it is Battlefield 3 with more effort put into the graphics and features. Too bad I will still buy it! I hate you EA xD.

I keep seeing people saying this, only because their ART style is the same. Better graphics, improved and new features sound like a new game to me. And it seems like the single player might be worth people's time now.

Plus, you can dive underwater in MP now. And yes, the fish will move out of the way when you do so.

 

[Jad Chaar]

I keep seeing people saying this, only because their ART style is the same. Better graphics, improved and new features sound like a new game to me. And it seems like the single player might be worth people's time now.

Plus, you can dive underwater in MP now. And yes, the fish will move out of the way when you do so.

Yeah, it is definitely a new game. I just think it should be called Bad Company 3, not a whole new Battlefield.

 

[lawfer]

I keep seeing people saying this, only because their ART style is the same. Better graphics, improved and new features sound like a new game to me. And it seems like the single player might be worth people's time now.

Plus, you can dive underwater in MP now. And yes, the fish will move out of the way when you do so.

Yeah, it is definitely a new game. I just think it should be called Bad Company 3, not a whole new Battlefield.

You and me both. But DICE said that even if they wanted, they can't, seeing how they are working on BF4, Mirror's Edge 2, and Battlefront 3 right now. Guess we have a few more years until we see BC3.

 

[Jad Chaar]

You and me both. But DICE said that even if they wanted, they can't, seeing how they are working on BF4, Mirror's Edge 2, and Battlefront 3 right now. Guess we have a few more years until we see BC3.

I think they should delay BF4... I feel they are rushing it. Also, I hope they dont screw up Battlefront 3 because Battlefront 1 and 2 were amazing.

 

[amstech]

And I just went from "BF4 will be just another BF game" to "holy crap I just might want to play this".

 

[lawfer]

You and me both. But DICE said that even if they wanted, they can't, seeing how they are working on BF4, Mirror's Edge 2, and Battlefront 3 right now. Guess we have a few more years until we see BC3.

I think they should delay BF4... I feel they are rushing it. Also, I hope they dont screw up Battlefront 3 because Battlefront 1 and 2 were amazing.

Yeah, that's another misconception among players. BF4 has been in development for 2 years now. But they already had the technology in place.

3 year development time sounds about right for a good, lengthy game. But what most people don't know is that out of these 3 years, one and half includes the actual creation of the game. The other half is where the programmers build/tailor the engine for the game they want to make. This process is usually repeated with every single game; you want a FPS? Spend a year and a half (or more if you're Skyrim) making the engine and tool-set for it, and add another year or so building the actual game on top of it. Rinse and repeat, for every single game. Sounds like a lot of work, right?

Frostbite, on the other hand, has a dedicated team only working on it. Which means DICE has had the full 2 years to work on the game itself while another team provides updates to the source code, which would have otherwise taken time away from making the game, like with BF3. Frostbite is now being used on Command & Conquer, NFS and the new Dragon Age, which means those teams can work on the game, while the Frostbite team (note: not DICE) works on the engine. Win-win.

 

[Mister_K]

And I just went from "BF4 will be just another BF game" to "holy crap I just might want to play this".

I think we all did!

Looks absolutely breath taking, can't wait. As TomSEA said, I wonder what the requirements will be.

 

[soldier1969]

Well I know what I will be playing for the next 18 months plus starting in October...

 

[GeforcerFX]

Ok ok I will buy this game, just really wish EA and Valve would grill up the beef between them so I can have the game in my library on steam, BF3 was just to buggy and frustrating to me and even though I was pretty good at it those bugs and the constant 180 changes in how the game played every patch really took the fun away, I could see in Beta they had a lot of nice features in the FB2 engine but they were taken out for release. A lot of those appear to be back in FB3 and looking even better, hopefully netcode and gun play is fixed this time around, if all else fails I really don't see the BFBC2 PC community shrinking anymore we have a dedicated 10,000 or so different players on every week, and some really good servers still going around, and better yet I can launch it from steam.

 

[LNCPapa]

I don't care what the requirements will be - as long as it's not Origin I will buy the requirements to play this!

 

[Jad Chaar]

Yeah, that's another misconception among players. BF4 has been in development for 2 years now. But they already had the technology in place.

3 year development time sounds about right for a good, lengthy game. But what most people don't know is that out of these 3 years, one and half includes the actual creation of the game. The other half is where the programmers build/tailor the engine for the game they want to make. This process is usually repeated with every single game; you want a FPS? Spend a year and a half (or more if you're Skyrim) making the engine and tool-set for it, and add another year or so building the actual game on top of it. Rinse and repeat, for every single game. Sounds like a lot of work, right?

Frostbite, on the other hand, has a dedicated team only working on it. Which means DICE has had the full 2 years to work on the game itself while another team provides updates to the source code, which would have otherwise taken time away from making the game, like with BF3. Frostbite is now being used on Command & Conquer, NFS and the new Dragon Age, which means those teams can work on the game, while the Frostbite team (note: not DICE) works on the engine. Win-win.

Yeah, well said.

 

[Jad Chaar]

I don't care what the requirements will be - as long as it's not Origin I will buy the requirements to play this!

They wont put it on Steam. BF3 already made Origin a "forced hit" amongst gamers who play EA games. Because it has gained "popularity", they will continue to support it. BF4 will help increase Origins use.

 

[Guest]

Putang inang to.

 

[Littleczr]

And I just bought a gtx 680 on eBay. To me 45+ frames per second is a good experience for first person shooters. From the looks of it, I say only the titan will be able to play it at 45 frames per with everything turned on at 1080p.
Sucks that I have a 1440p monitor, I may need to buy another gtx 680.

 

[danhodge]

Oh yeah? Well on COD, fish swim away from you! Beat that...

 

[Skidmarksdeluxe]

I don't care what the requirements will be - as long as it's not Origin I will buy the requirements to play this!

Can I tag along with you?

 

[Skidmarksdeluxe]

And I just bought a gtx 680 on eBay. To me 45+ frames per second is a good experience for first person shooters. From the looks of it, I say only the titan will be able to play it at 45 frames per with everything turned on at 1080p.
Sucks that I have a 1440p monitor, I may need to buy another gtx 680.

It'll be cheaper to buy a 1080p monitor... And a lot less complicated.

 

[LukeDJ]

And I just bought a gtx 680 on eBay. To me 45+ frames per second is a good experience for first person shooters. From the looks of it, I say only the titan will be able to play it at 45 frames per with everything turned on at 1080p.
Sucks that I have a 1440p monitor, I may need to buy another gtx 680.

It'll be cheaper to buy a 1080p monitor... And a lot less complicated.

Or he could turn his resolution down to 1080p.

Even cheaper, and even less complicated!

 

[Nobina]

Graphics are amazing but that's not what makes the game good. Anyway, If only Titan will be able to max out settings than people with mid range PCs won't be able to play this game at all (maybe on lowest settings), which will discourage them from buying the game.