SNGX1275
Posts: 10,615 +467
Appears now legislators are trying to send you to jail for 3 years.
While I agree that its wrong to have pre-releases if you aren't an Academy Award Judge, I think going to jail for 3 years is a bit harsh.
Take the money it costs taxpayers to lock someone up for 3 years and use that money to go to the source of the problem, the people doing the leaking of prereleases. There are much fewer of them than there are of people that can obtain access to it once iits leaked.
Source: CNET NewsA copy of the bill seen by CNET News.com, marked "Discussion Draft," represents one of the fiercest attacks yet on peer-to-peer networks from copyright holders' allies on Capitol Hill.
The threat of a three-year prison term kicks in when anyone makes an illicit copy of a movie "available on a computer network accessible to members of the public," when the film "was intended for commercial distribution but had not been so distributed at the time."
While I agree that its wrong to have pre-releases if you aren't an Academy Award Judge, I think going to jail for 3 years is a bit harsh.
Take the money it costs taxpayers to lock someone up for 3 years and use that money to go to the source of the problem, the people doing the leaking of prereleases. There are much fewer of them than there are of people that can obtain access to it once iits leaked.