And specifically WHICH dll was not registered (in this case)?
LookinAround Posts: 6,429 +186 Sep 26, 2013 #27 jobeard said: And specifically WHICH dll was not registered (in this case)? Click to expand... [FONT=Consolas]C:\Windows\SysWOW64\actxprxy.dll[/FONT] The 32-bit version of actxprxy.dll
jobeard said: And specifically WHICH dll was not registered (in this case)? Click to expand... [FONT=Consolas]C:\Windows\SysWOW64\actxprxy.dll[/FONT] The 32-bit version of actxprxy.dll
D DelJo63 Sep 26, 2013 #28 Btw: GREAT job! The whole concept of needing to register dlls is poor software architecture, as only windows uses this techniques to manage dynamic libraries :sigh:
Btw: GREAT job! The whole concept of needing to register dlls is poor software architecture, as only windows uses this techniques to manage dynamic libraries :sigh:
LookinAround Posts: 6,429 +186 Sep 26, 2013 #29 jobeard said: Btw: GREAT job! The whole concept of needing to register dlls is poor software architecture, as only windows uses this techniques to manage dynamic libraries :sigh: Click to expand... Thank you! I'm glad this expedition ended with a solution!
jobeard said: Btw: GREAT job! The whole concept of needing to register dlls is poor software architecture, as only windows uses this techniques to manage dynamic libraries :sigh: Click to expand... Thank you! I'm glad this expedition ended with a solution!
D DelJo63 Sep 26, 2013 #30 Yes - - but all learning is filled with failures along the way - - eg Edison's attempt at the light bulb
Yes - - but all learning is filled with failures along the way - - eg Edison's attempt at the light bulb