Intel Pentium G4560: Kaby Lake's Real Gift

Funny review. people are still multi tasking with a dual core cpu?? I dont get it. does intel have a "budget" quad core? are they trying to tell consumers that budget has to be dual core? AMD has budget quad cores for about the same price, and are better at true multitasking. no real consumer just runs one program at a time and a dual core will not hold up to what a true multitasker needs. well if this is what consumer on a budget wants, give it to them.
 
Intel never give things for free. By recent rumors, I can bet AMD will offer 4C/4T Ryzen for around $100, mark my words. Thats why Intel went so low with pricing, at $62 its unbeatable, this is truly best offer I have ever seen.

?2C/4T or 4C/8T, but 4C/4T ain't happening.
And since I don't game, I just stick with my FX-8320 right now.
For well threaded applications it still dusts i3 based solutions.
 
Those budget CPU's are quite frankly amazing. We just need to go back before the "I" generations. If you bought budget you had to settle with a celeron, which was as budget as they would come. Slow, inefficient, just plain bad. I recently built a small pc for a family member for everyday home office use. No gaming (besides the occasional game of solitaire) I already had a h110 mobo and 16 gigs of RAM (2* 8Gb HyperX DDR4-2133) lying around, and I'd upgraded the mobo bios to support Kaby Lakes, planning to use a 4560, but got a i3-6100 2nd hand for just 30 bucks. Along with a 240 Gb Samsung EVO 840 I also had lying around, it turned out to be a quite fast little desktop for everyday tasks. Booting windows, surfing in Chrome and those kind of tasks, I can hardly tell any speed difference between that and my own i7-6700. It doesn't consume much power, the computer is very quiet (a Noctua NH-U9S cpu cooler keeps it very cool). So for a budget cpu it really packs a punch compared to what budget CPUs could show just a few years ago.
 
Back