Just noticed this bit over at www.theinquirer.net:
Seems like being a reporter ain't all that fun... {g}
Intel, Via lawyers drag INQ into Pentium 4 patent battle
What's it gotta do with us?
By Mike Magee, 08/04/2002 20:38:55 BST
http://www.theinquirer.net/08040213.htm
CHIP GIANTS Intel and Via have made a story by the INQUIRER the centre of their legal battle in the UK over alleged patent infringements over the Pentium 4.
This, said editor-in-chief Mike Magee is the pot calling the kettle black and he has refused to appear as a witness for or against the case.
The story that will be used in court - if it gets to court, is Intel 'will sue Via' over Pentium 4". In that story, like any other sensible person, we reported what the Economic News of Taiwan said.
The story on the INQUIRER appeared on the 10th of August last, and quoted an Intel APAC president as saying his firm would take legal action against any firm that contravened Pentium 4 patents.
The case is set to start in December of this year and has legal implications worldwide, as the two CPU firms battle over the Pentium 4.
But the problem for the INQUIRER is that both firms have had lawyers call us, asking for the background to the story.
Under UK law, we believe we are not allowed to tender one story or another and have to tell the truth.
Which we will do.
Journalists should not be subpoenad into corporate cases like this however, we believe.
Seems like being a reporter ain't all that fun... {g}