Intel's 14nm Skylake platform to support DDR4, PCIe 4.0, SATA Express

Yes until religion is out of education and politics, it is still affecting rate of advancement of society and tech.
Awe how sad, you can't get anything done because your neighbor believes in God. Your acting as if there hasn't been any advancements in decades. As well as acting as if you can't do an honest days work, if you spend 5 minutes on your knees and watch your tongue 24/7. Give me a F_cking break!

Religion has been deluded over the last few centuries, it no longer holds any meaning. But yet here you are holding the very thing we've lost, as a cause behind failure to advance. I guess it is always fitting to blame the guy that is no longer with us for any problems we face.

You say "until religion is out of education and politics", and then I ask "Which one of the false religions are you talking about?". Where you see religion, I don't see religion at all.

You want to blame something for our lack in technological advancements, look at the patents system and companies stringing us along on the same ole crap simply because they can.
 
Awe how sad, you can't get anything done because your neighbor believes in God. Your acting as if there hasn't been any advancements in decades. As well as acting as if you can't do an honest days work, if you spend 5 minutes on your knees and watch your tongue 24/7. Give me a F_cking break!
I said nothing of the sort. I said it is hampering. I.e. reducing & interfering.
 
Awe how sad, you can't get anything done because your neighbor believes in God. Your acting as if there hasn't been any advancements in decades. As well as acting as if you can't do an honest days work, if you spend 5 minutes on your knees and watch your tongue 24/7. Give me a F_cking break!



Religion has been deluded over the last few centuries, it no longer holds any meaning. But yet here you are holding the very thing we've lost, as a cause behind failure to advance. I guess it is always fitting to blame the guy that is no longer with us for any problems we face.

It still partly effect eduction and upbringing of kids, so in a sense, it does hold certain people from their full potential.
 
That should be around the time when I'm ready to upgrade my boxes. Skylake sounds like it will support enough technology to be worth the wait.
 
What I don't understand is why we going from quad channel to dual channel is that a step back or just that memory is so much faster we don't need it anymore. Also I wonder if the same president is going to follow where we are going to see timings of 30-30-30-15. So the memory will be just the same. Look at this trend. DDr 2-2-2-2 ddr2 4.4.4.4 ddr3 8.8.8.8 and so on. I know the numbers are just in the ball park but you get the idea. It muffles the speed so you almost get the same or similar back. Only advantage is power efficiency which you only need for laptops or if you a city power manager and say that you save kilowatts per million of people. Or building a spaceship and are concerned if the power will last next galaxy over.
 
Have faith in your tech or tech in your faith. That is the question. Or is it just a command?
 
It is a good idea to do at least a small research before contradicting somebody here... It is 16Gb/s. Do your own home work. Just one of endless sources on the net: http://www.computerworld.com/s/arti..._16Gbit_SATA_Express_systems_coming_this_year
please don't link wierd articles. 99% of tech websites (the respectable ones like techspot) say it's GB/s. If I'm not sure about something then I shut up or just say so in my comment.
here's the official press release from the actual guys who make PCIe:
http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/November_18_2010_Press_Release/

"it is possible for products designed to the PCIe 3.0 architecture to achieve bandwidth near 1 gigabyte per second (GB/s) in one direction on a single-lane (x1) configuration and scale to an aggregate approaching 32 GB/s on a sixteen-lane (x16) configuration"

Another good quote:
"It is a good idea to do at least a small research before contradicting somebody here... It is 16GB/s. Do your own home work. Just one of endless sources on the net: https://www.techspot.com/news/41212-pci-express-30-specification-released.html"

PS: I reread your link: it's not even for PCIe; It's for SATA Express... that homework you do must be math (I also hated math in school). A quote from your own article: "PCIe technology enables interface speeds of up to 1GB/s per client lane, versus today's SATA technology speeds of up to 0.6GB/s."
 
please don't link wierd articles. 99% of tech websites (the respectable ones like techspot) say it's GB/s. If I'm not sure about something then I shut up or just say so in my comment.
here's the official press release from the actual guys who make PCIe:
http://www.pcisig.com/news_room/November_18_2010_Press_Release/

"it is possible for products designed to the PCIe 3.0 architecture to achieve bandwidth near 1 gigabyte per second (GB/s) in one direction on a single-lane (x1) configuration and scale to an aggregate approaching 32 GB/s on a sixteen-lane (x16) configuration"

Another good quote:
"It is a good idea to do at least a small research before contradicting somebody here... It is 16GB/s. Do your own home work. Just one of endless sources on the net: https://www.techspot.com/news/41212-pci-express-30-specification-released.html"

PS: I reread your link: it's not even for PCIe; It's for SATA Express... that homework you do must be math (I also hated math in school). A quote from your own article: "PCIe technology enables interface speeds of up to 1GB/s per client lane, versus today's SATA technology speeds of up to 0.6GB/s."


Just how dumb is this? The article was talking about SATA Express speeds, which was exactly what I quoted in the beginning, correcting the speed published. But no, of course you didn't read that, neither did you read the article. But you keep posting this crap here about speed of PCI Express, which got nothing to do with it.
 
Just how dumb is this? The article was talking about SATA Express speeds, which was exactly what I quoted in the beginning, correcting the speed published. But no, of course you didn't read that, neither did you read the article. But you keep posting this crap here about speed of PCI Express, which got nothing to do with it.
yep sry my mistake. I call this "tunnel vision". too focused on something. it happens once a year. ^_^
 
So looking more into it to see if it would be a waste of cash buying a card that may need the extra bandwidth, I have to say many forums were saying no cards use the full bandwidth from 2.0 yet, the 3.0 is too far ahead atm. So I can not atm agree with the need of 4.0 with new cards just yet.
But if someone wants to educate :)

This is a joke right?
 
Nah make it crystal based computers like in Guuauld mother ships to be safe. Oh wait a minute that is in skyfy show. We don't have that kind of tech yet since christians forbid forward movement in the name of religion.

Let's take a closer look at that premise...:eek:
The best that the outside world can hope for, is that Texas will execute a fair percentage of their secondary school students anyway.

(And sorry, but you do have to follow DBZ's link to get that joke).
 
This will release about the time I upgrade my GTX 780 and to a 4K display from a 2560 x 1600 one now, prices should be around a grand for one by then...
 
You would think by now we would have the next Gen of systems but still a very slow process. The OS still requires manual clean as it can't clean orphan or duplicate files corrupted registry the rest of the clutter file system.

Faster system going to slow down because of the OS blues. In the TV Series Journeyman had the next get of systems without using LED/LCD monitor it was all more transparent system base on touch screen.

Today were still on 32-bit and some what mix 32/64-bit platforms no where near the 128/256-bit CPU powers.
 
Back