Japan Display Inc. announces 651ppi display

[amstech]

This comment "First, your U3011 is only 50% as smooth... technically" doesn't address anything I said nor does it counter any points I made.

You carefully read before your post.

 

[amstech]

Anyways, not trying to be prick just saying!


"Edit on last post"
"You should read carefully before you post"

 

[Guest]

Shouldn't the "pixels per SQUARE INCH" read instead as LINEAR inches?
Why do people get ppi mixed up like that? After all, even FAX machines are 200 dpi, but if they were 200 pixels total per square inch they would only have 14.14 pixels on each side from top to bottom! Let us just test that here for a moment-
..............
There you go, 14 pixels, if a person wants to check it out, the "dpi" (or "ppi) concept is not the same as pixels per square inch. One letter of the alphabet alone could use up 14 or more pixels. Square inches are not the same as dpi.

 

[Guest]

sorry last guest you are mistaken, dpi stands for dot-pixel-inches and is the SI unit for splungeness in color printing

 

[Guest]

I guess people forget about the IBM 22 inch 3840x2400 LCD monitor from like 2003(?) that is over 600ppi. We did this nearly ten years ago (of course it was probably 20k to buy, now like $350). Why can't we see just 2560x1600 or x1440 monitors with 120hz... bah.. oh well.

 

[spydercanopus]

You're gonna want that PPI when you upgrade your 'iContact Lenses'.

 

[Guest]

I missed that before..... DPI stands for Dots Per Inch. :/