Justice Department reportedly considering pressing charges against WikiLeaks

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,284   +192
Staff member

The Department of Justice is reportedly considering whether or not to press charges against various WikiLeaks members including founder Julian Assange.

The Washington Post says prosecutors in recent weeks have been drafting a memo that contemplates charges including conspiracy, theft of government property or perhaps even violation of the Espionage Act.

Under President Barack Obama, the Justice Department decided not to charge WikiLeaks for revealing secret government information as doing so would be similar to prosecuting a news organization for publishing classified information. The “problem,” if you want to call it that, is that the Obama administration never formally closed the case and now, the Trump-led DOJ is reportedly open to having another look.

The aforementioned memo, however, is not yet complete. What’s more, any charges brought against Assange or other members of WikiLeaks would need approval from the top ranks of the Justice Department.

Assange’s attorney, Barry J. Pollack, told the publication that the fact of the matter is – however frustrating it might be to whoever looks bad when information is published – WikiLeaks is a publisher and they are publishing truthful information that is in the public’s interest. He added that he hopes this administration will be more respectful, not less respectful, of the First Amendment than the prior one was.

Michael Vatis, a former Justice Department official who oversaw ­cybercrime investigations, told the Post that he thinks the only realistic hope [for prosecution] is some conspiracy charge based on WikiLeaks’ involvement in an actual hacking, not just publishing results of a hacking.

Image courtesy Frank Augstein, AP

Permalink to story.

 
It wouldn't be too hard for the US government, esp. with the help of overseas allies, to create a false electronic trail that implicated Wikileaks in actual hacking. I think this would only come to pass if Wikileaks did something to REALLY anger the Trump administration, like harboring a serious leaker. The people that truly need to be brought to justice are government employees or contractors who illegally distribute classified intel. There's a very high chance that a lot of the most recent Wikileaks data acquisition simply walked out the door in the pocket of somebody who betrayed their nation's trust. Here's the deal with state-sponsored hacking: I don't have a problem with it so long is legal and accounted for. Even if the activities are kept secret from the public for a number of years, as long as an official record is kept then you have accountability. Illegal mass surveillance is NOT acceptable - ever. If there's no warrant or probable cause then the government has absolutely no grounds to be wiretapping someone. On the other hand I actually WANT my government hacking the holy hell out of states like Iran, N Korea, Russia, etc. Any state with a belligerent, imperialist regime or ties to "illegal combatants" should be monitored closely by any means available.
 
In the early days I would agree that Julian was very much on the side of the ordinary citizen, but the last release was more than reckless, it showed the kind of contempt that strongly lends itself to a foreign intelligence service feeding him the information. Some compare him to Snowden but there is one very large and significant difference; Snowden made his releases to news services and implored them to comb through the documents and remove anything that could/would have an impact on agents or other persons that would be put in peril from the information. Julian simply releases it all, which has an obvious danger to it.

I will be the first to recognize that the government has severely abused the rules of secrecy and classification of information, especially when it shows elements of the government double-dealing against the American people for profit, political gain, etc. This country has always been known for putting our dirty laundry right out on main street for all the world to see, in fact it is one of those things that is most admired; being strong enough to weather any storm and remain a democracy.

I believe Julian's intentions were sincere in the beginning, but now .... well, let's let him defend himself without hiding behind somebody else's skirts and then see how great he is or if he is just a political pawn.
Only time will tell for sure.
 
In the early days I would agree that Julian was very much on the side of the ordinary citizen, but the last release was more than reckless, it showed the kind of contempt that strongly lends itself to a foreign intelligence service feeding him the information. Some compare him to Snowden but there is one very large and significant difference; Snowden made his releases to news services and implored them to comb through the documents and remove anything that could/would have an impact on agents or other persons that would be put in peril from the information. Julian simply releases it all, which has an obvious danger to it.

I will be the first to recognize that the government has severely abused the rules of secrecy and classification of information, especially when it shows elements of the government double-dealing against the American people for profit, political gain, etc. This country has always been known for putting our dirty laundry right out on main street for all the world to see, in fact it is one of those things that is most admired; being strong enough to weather any storm and remain a democracy.

I believe Julian's intentions were sincere in the beginning, but now .... well, let's let him defend himself without hiding behind somebody else's skirts and then see how great he is or if he is just a political pawn.
Only time will tell for sure.

Dude's currently hiding in an Embassy from Rape charges. I don't think his intentions were ever pure. He even went back on his word to come back to the US after Chelsea manning was released.
 
Back