Like you, I cut the cable, too. I am also not that much of a TV watcher, though I have been enjoying various older TV shows on Hulu such as MI-5. Sports was not a big consideration for me, however, I am a hockey fan, and the NHL's streaming service is a far better deal (if I were to subscribe) for me than Sling.
For the more technically inclined of the readers, I would recommend ditching anything like Roku or any such STB in favor of an HTPC - that way, you only need one "box" for all streaming services and OTA TV - plus, if one uses one of the widely available and free software packages like MediaPortal (Windows only) you get all the DVR functionality for OTA TV - all in one box. The HTPC will cost more, however, what is gained in flexibility is worth the extra expense - at least to me.
I don't want to discourage anyone, but I have been an OTA nut for years. In some ways, DTV is worse than analog TV was. I live in an area that is low in elevation compared to the surrounding area, and this makes it difficult to receive DTV. The "why" of it is that what was implemented for DTV in the US is essentially DTV sent via an analog means. It is susceptible to multipath interference - which is what used to cause a phenomena called "ghosting" in the old analog TV days. I've researched my problem quite a bit, and I have found that there are people in other areas of the country where you would expect excellent DTV reception, but because of geographic considerations, the reception is less than great.
On the upside of DTV, if you live in a area that is good for DTV reception, you might just get upwards of 70 or more stations with a high quality signal all the time.
In problem areas for DTV reception, though it might seem "old hat", an antenna mounted on the roof with a rotor will go a long, long way to getting signal you might not otherwise get, and improving what you already get.
Also, _most_ amplifiers out there a junk, IMHO, but might work for people IF the area they live in allows reasonable reception of signal. However, there is one factor that makes a big difference, from personal experience, and that is how much noise the amplifier itself injects into the OTA signal.
When I cut the cord, I thought I had a very high quality amp with a very low noise figure. However, after researching amps, I found this -
http://kitztech.com/
For some, it might be pricy, however, this amp significantly reduced dropout in bad weather to the point where both my wife and myself agree that it was a good buy. With the amp I had, bad weather would make some of the stations I get unwatchable, however, with this amp, all my stations are watchable even in bad weather. There are still some glitches, but they are insignificant compared to how bad the glitches used to be. There are other aspects of this amp that make it probably one of the two best on the market at this time, but I am not going to get into that.
Also, Bing points will get you some things for free - like Hulu+
I will never go back either. I'm paying $35/mo for 15 mbps internet, and that is great for my needs at this time. There is a fiber service slowly rolling out in our area that is offering 100 mbps service for $50/mo. When that is finally available to me, I'm dropping TW. Without the cost of the internet access, I pay $8/mo for Netflix, $4/mo for Amazon Prime (I qualify as a student), nothing except searching with Bing for Hulu+, and $4/mo for a show the wife watches from iTunes. So, that is $16/mo for what used to cost me $85/mo with Dish Network - and I still had to pay extra for internet service.
Although your article seems to imply it, I highly doubt that OTA free TV will go away any time soon, and people will still watch live TV. The ATSC in the US is working on a next-gen broadcast scheme, and I really, really hope that they implement something that is not as problematic as the current OTA DTV broadcast scheme in the US.
One thing that my wife and I particularly like about Netflix is that it has plenty of great "art house" movies - so many that we consider it better than going to the "art house" movie theater in our area.
One last note: I would not be surprised to see ESPN start offering some sort of streaming package in the not too distant future.
As I see it, there is life without a cable or satellite TV subscription, and it is great.