Actually, it does. I expect that a human being can be causey, intolerant, self righteous, indignant of everything they don't agree with, and still be judged "a good person", by you.
The reason for that is quite simple. The entire generation they're from is pretty much rife with overindulged snot bags, and that makes it hard to tell one from the other, and even more difficult to determine where a "good person" begins, or an "overindulged snot bag" ends. (And of course, vice-versa).
Once upon a time, we actually had to work, when we went to work. We didn't even have an internet to check Facebook, to "tweet", such gravitas things like, "I'm taking a pop on company time". Then too, no internet porn to surf on company time.
In short, we went to work, to "work", not to run around with our noses up the bosses a**, trying to find fault with his political, social, sexual, or religious values.
So, all these "good people", need to get their collective nose out of the boss's behind, and put them back in their monitors where they belong, doing Mozilla things, on Mozilla time. When it's time to clock out, then they can be as indignant as they want, about whatever they want.
And just as sure as you are that the, "Mozilla dissidents against CEO opinions", are, "good people", I'm every bit as certain, that Mozilla's new CEO is "a good person", regardless of how he feels about gay marriage, or anything else to do with his personal value system.
In other words, those "good people" should simply shut up and do their jobs. And that's not me being "intolerant", that's me telling you how "the game" works.
