GhostRyder
Posts: 2,151 +588
Yeah, my claim is the odds that 2011 pins fell upon the year of 2011 when it was released. Your argument is that it coincidentally just happened to fall on that and your backup to this is showing what each pin was designed and what the intentions behind it were. The fact is, things can be added and removed, when building a chip/socket because of needs/design choices. Explaining why they did it that way does not make up for the tiny chance those two things would match up.Believe what you wish. Some people place their faith in many things that the majority scoff at. Just because logic and literature don't back up your argument it shouldn't deter you from your beliefs. Just remember that this is public forum, so you're going to be better off clarifying what constitutes your opinion from fact...
...because if you're telling everyone it is a fact when it's just your musings, you are going to get asked for proof.
BTW: If you want to know how Intel actually market their product, I suggest you check out the literature:
Marketing it a key aspect for all companies, while this may not be significant to most, the back of our mind has a different opinion and will sub-consciously influence us.
At your last pic, cute...So I guess anyone who does not conform to your opinion on matters is automatically a tin foil hat wearer huh?