TechSpot

Nvidia reportedly working on GeForce GTX 750 Ti

By Scorpus
Sep 11, 2013
Post New Reply
  1. So far, Nvidia's GeForce 700 series comprises of the high-end GTX 780 and GTX 700, as well as the mid-range GTX 760. But in preparation for this holiday season's blockbuster game releases, such as Battlefield 4 and Call of Duty:...

    Read more
     
  2. TechGamer

    TechGamer TS Addict Posts: 365   +38

    And 760 ti?
     
  3. hahahanoobs

    hahahanoobs TS Evangelist Posts: 1,631   +432

    GTX 700 = GTX 770
     
  4. Jad Chaar

    Jad Chaar TS Evangelist Posts: 6,477   +965

    The Radeon 7790 would be a 650Ti Boost killer if it werent for the 128bit memory interface.
     
  5. ikesmasher

    ikesmasher TS Evangelist Posts: 2,550   +852

    "while out performing the GTX 660"
    F UUUUUUUUU NVIDIA
    I hate instantly obsolete parts.
     
  6. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 6,476   +2,034

    So we can safely say you hate all PC parts?...
     
    cliffordcooley likes this.
  7. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,891   +1,258

    Can anyone explain why the supposed GPU-Z screen shows two different drivers ( 326.80 AND 326.41) :rolleyes:
    [​IMG]

    BTW: The 256 bit bus width says the GPU is a GK 104, while the device ID (11C7) says it is a GK 106

    /cues circus music
     
  8. ikesmasher

    ikesmasher TS Evangelist Posts: 2,550   +852

    exactly. Its a love/hate relationship.
     
    misor and cliffordcooley like this.
  9. It'd be interesting to see at what price band Nvidia is going to place the new GTX 750 Ti.
    GTX 650 Ti was a sweet deal in terms of price/performance and GTX 750 Ti should be at least around $180 range if it need to attract budget gamers despite having more raw power. Just my 2ยข.
     
  10. Laimis

    Laimis TS Rookie

    Honestly I think the current selection of Nvidia GPU's is enough. Recently I've scavenged myself a new PC and popped in a 760, which I've chosen as an 'enough' option for my 24'' 1920x1200 screen. And so far it has been more than enough to play what I like.
    From what I've learned reading all the reviews on GPU's if I would pop in another 760, the 2 of them would outperform the next generation *70 or even *80 GPU solution.
     
  11. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder This guy again... Posts: 2,191   +590

    Attribute it to poor support on the CPU-Z end, its probably unable to register what the true part is. Its even naming it as 2 different things (760 SE or 750 ti) so its a mystery. For all we know though, its on the same list showing cards that don't exist for the lawlz, I don't recall seeing a 750ti in the list coming out this year, so like I said before, its a mystery.

    Well true, you an always do that and its a good way to get a real powerful machine while saving a buck or two. I know loads of people who do it and ive done it in the past.

    In my opinion, I wish both companies would stop with these odd numbered cards and versions of cards. I was hoping this gen to say goodbye to TI variants and get back to just 740, 750, 760, 770, 780 or from AMD 9750, 9770, 9850, 9870, 9950, 9970. I always found it annoying when they would make a 750 or 60 TI, or a 7790, or just things like a GHZ edition. Not that any of those cards are bad cards, they are great cards, I just like it clean cut and straight to the point without all the in-between cards existing.
     
  12. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,891   +1,258

    Firstly, it's GPU-Z
    Secondly, the latest iteration of GPU-Z released today has support for AMD's Volcanic Islands (which aren't due for release for at least 6 weeks) but makes no mention of what essentially would be no more than a clock bumped 660 ?
    Thirdly, GPU-Z would never list two different drivers for a single device.

    The only area where GPU-Z could misreport would be the bus width - unlikely since overclocking the physical bits is pretty damn unorthodox. The PCI device ID for GK 104 (256-bit) is 11xx (1180 for GTX 680, 1189 for GTX 670, 1187 for GTX 760, 1184 for GTX 770 etc) while the ID for GK 106 (192-bit) is 11Cx ( 11C0 for GTX 660, 11C2 for GTX 650 Ti Boost, 11C6 GTX 650 Ti etc)

    In short, while there could be a 750 Ti in the making, it certainly isn't going to conform to that GPU-Z capture- which is almost certainly shopped, especially since there is no GPU-Z validation for it - and for what its worth, even the ultra-top-secret next generation of AMD's cards have that
     
  13. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder This guy again... Posts: 2,191   +590

    I never said it was a legit post, I said it can be attributed to it, this happens pretty often where things are min-interpreted by GPU-Z or CPU-Z, its pretty common, however it can be a fake as that happens just as much. Since it was not in the official charts, it was more than likely a faked image.

    Also, the Volcanic islands "Leaks" and talks have been going a lot longer than the supposed 750ti, which would more attribute to having GPU-z support for them over something that just appeared in the last 2 days.
     
  14. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,891   +1,258

    That's not how it works. GPU-Z support is linked to the release date on the cards. The closer the launch, means that the vendor is supplying W1zzard with the relevant information. Cards don't launch without GPU-Z support these days.
    As for supposed validity, that is the whole purpose behind the actual validation process...otherwise every Tom, D1ck, or Harry would just edit the INF file and claim whatever BS they like*.
    [​IMG]
    *Note that you can't falsify the PCI device ID or claim two separate drivers for the same device.
     
  15. GhostRyder

    GhostRyder This guy again... Posts: 2,191   +590

    Sigh...
    The 750ti is not out nor is there full proof yet it exists as this debate is showing, hence low-none GPU-Z support.

    I never said this was real, I said;
    I said it could be faked because as you pointed out you cant fake things like the Nvidia version that show up in GPU-Z, however there would not be support for a card that's first leak talk was today (If it is legit).

    I rest my case, im saying that your right, it looks faked, but there is always the chance that some of the attributes from that supposed screenshot are legit but due to GPU-Z missing something though highly unlikely since as you said it has two different driver versions listed.

    Though an obvious mistake to the person who "Faked" it seems kind of like a hard miss to be frank.
     
  16. havok585

    havok585 TS Booster Posts: 121   +19

    Bullsh1T ! u need a 7850 and OC'ed to beat the ti boost.
     
  17. Jad Chaar

    Jad Chaar TS Evangelist Posts: 6,477   +965

    I said that... if the 7790 had a 192bit interface like the 650Ti boost it will demolish it because it has more cores and a high clock.
     
  18. dividebyzero

    dividebyzero trainee n00b Posts: 4,891   +1,258

    Extremely unlikely. AMD chose a 128-bit bus because it balances the back end ( 16 ROP's- or more specifically four partitions @ 4 colour ops per clock). Adding another memory controller without being able to process the render just moves the bottleneck from the memory bus to raster ops.
    This is precisely why the GTX 650 Ti Boost featured both an increase in bus ( from 128-bit to 192-bit) as well as a 50% increase in ROP count (from 16 to 24) from the original GTX 650 Ti
     
    Jad Chaar likes this.
  19. Jad Chaar

    Jad Chaar TS Evangelist Posts: 6,477   +965

    Ah, thanks for clearing that up.
     

Similar Topics

Add New Comment

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...