OCZ Arc 100 SSD Review: Aiming for the Value Sweet Spot
- Thread starter Steve
- Start date
G
Guest
Well I was looking into an SSD, and as I format my PC whenever the mood takes me or a nice fresh install is on the cards, endurance was a factor. The Samsung Evo Pro 840 (256GB), Kingston HyperX 3k (240GB) and the Corsair Neutron GTX (256GB), had all made it passed a Petabyte of data writes.
Hopefully the Samsung 850 would have no problem in doing the same.
If I am going to buy an SSD I would either splash enough for a fast durable OS drive, or I want oodles of room.
And .50/gig, £/$1000 will get you 2TBs worth. Insane as a storage solution.
Hopefully the Samsung 850 would have no problem in doing the same.
If I am going to buy an SSD I would either splash enough for a fast durable OS drive, or I want oodles of room.
And .50/gig, £/$1000 will get you 2TBs worth. Insane as a storage solution.
VitalyT
Posts: 6,833 +8,116
G
Guest
No more OCZ for me, I've been burn by them twice with failed SSDs. Samsung and Intel for me, they may cost more, but they are a lot better.
G
Guest
Judging by the review the MX100 is actually cheaper and still manages to be a better quality drive.
G
Guest
I purchased two 120GB OCZ Vertex+ SSDs over 2 years ago. They're used daily and never had an once of bother out of either of them.
Yea, it was with the Vector drives that OCZ "promised" that now reliability was top priority.
Funny how that's not reflected in the numbers: http://www.hardware.fr/articles/920-7/ssd.html
Funny how that's not reflected in the numbers: http://www.hardware.fr/articles/920-7/ssd.html
G
Guest
Soon to come tho is tlc from toshiba , so maybe this just a warm up project b4 they start shipping affordable 0.5Tb disks no?
captaincranky
Posts: 19,684 +8,824
Did that really need to be en Francais?
Similar threads
