Ok
I'll have to let it slide this time !!!
.....
But in all truth there is a lot of "not kidding around" stuff like that going around in the forums. Basically people saying that anything below a E6300 is junk and will under perform.
Truth being, yes, conroe is a frickin monster series of chips and are going to be more future proof than if you buy a currant AMD cpu, but what people dont realize is that most of AMD's stuff gets a 4 star or higher rating for Vista.
I understand that direct x 10 is speculated to need the horse power given by the conroe series to run games at optimal settings but not all that want to run Vista arnt into gaming....plain and simple.....
I just dont like people misleading people......Yeah is $190 cheap for the e6300 that will perform like a FX-62 if OCed 200mhz ? Hell yeah.....But for the people that can only afford a A64 3200+ for $65 it isnt really an option....
So all in all is A64 as fast as the conroe series ? Not by any means......
But is the A64 seriies still able to run todays apps, games and a mojority of tomorrows with decent performance ? Yeah they will.......