Apparently AMD does not matter and no one needs AMD CPUs (at least this is what I can understand from this article). Even so, I think an AMD CPU would behave differently on a stock cooler.
As for the temperatures on Intel CPUs, I can tell you that on my i5 760 I get maximum 56 degrees C with a CM 212 cooler, while on a haswell i5 you get like 75 degrees C in stress applications with the same cooler (I've tested this). And also take into consideration that the Lynnfield CPU consumes more power than Haswell (without integrated GPU).
So why do we have this kind of difference between the 2 CPUs ? Well, it's because Intel decided that soldering of the IHS is too good for the average consumer, and thermal paste is good enough. What this means is that a Lynnfield CPU can survive with a stock Intel cooler in a stress tool with around 80 degrees C, while on Haswell you get like 100 degrees (on stock frequency).
What can I say, Intel is the best ...
Actually, when I delided my i5 750, I saw that the cpu wasn't soldered to the IHS, there was just some thermal paste, so Intel was already using thermal paste on their cpu's IHS back in 2009, and even back to the core 2 duo era they where already using thermal paste (altough only on their entry cpus like E7200)
Maybe the temperature's delta on your Lynnfield cpu is due to the W/mm² ratio wich is smaller on Lynnfield than on Haswell