Reddit bans 'alt-right' subreddits for doxing

[umbala]

Ha, sourcing infogalactic. That's funny. It's the alt-right news source founded by an alt-righter.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vox_Day

Are you legit citing Wikipedia to ilk and committing a category error while doing so?

Wikipedia's credibility is all marketing. I know people who have wiki pages (though, I don't know Vox). Wiki pages with false information that, when corrected, gets reverted by the SJWs who police the website.

Any dissenting new source is now fake and biased. We all know that websites founded by alt-right members are so honest /s.

Stop projecting.

I love how you didn't address the fact that he clearly called you a heavily biased alt-righter, but instead you chose to attack the credibility and motivations of any non-alt-right sources, in this case Wikipedia. Very typical move.

 

[davislane1]

I love when alt-right scumbags link to alt-right propaganda sites that masquerade to look like a Wikipedia page almost.

It's a fork of wikipedia intended to replace it. You read a tech website and can't identify a fork?

I love how you didn't address the fact that he clearly called you a heavily biased alt-righter, but instead you chose to attack the credibility and motivations of any non-alt-right sources, in this case Wikipedia. Very typical move.

Insecurity noted.

 

[mbrowne5061]

Not even remotely. Your entire first post, and this one too, smacks of being a moderate.

I genuinely feel sorry for you, if your political compass is pointed so far in one direction that even moderates are deserving of your contempt. I can't imagine walking around not being able to stand most people because they grew up in different circumstances, and so arrived at different political conclusions. It can't be pleasant.

 

[wiyosaya]

I love when alt-right scumbags link to alt-right propaganda sites that masquerade to look like a Wikipedia page almost.

It's a fork of wikipedia intended to replace it. You read a tech website and can't identify a fork?

And it has so much more credibility than Wikipedia!

 

[davislane1]

I genuinely feel sorry for you, if your political compass is pointed so far in one direction that even moderates are deserving of your contempt. I can't imagine walking around not being able to stand most people because they grew up in different circumstances, and so arrived at different political conclusions. It can't be pleasant.

This is why moderates are viewed with contempt. Not just by me, but by most people outside of the progressive left. You don't actually stand for anything (always trying to split the difference) but ride a moral high horse like you do.

Your projection is also noted. Just because someone disagrees with a belief or views a particular stance with contempt doesn't mean they dislike people in general or, for that matter, the people who hold those beliefs.

I just happen to think playing for participation trophies isn't something to be proud of.

 

[Draconian]

Let's not forget that Trump doxed Lindsey Graham during the primaries by giving away his cell phone number.

 

[wiyosaya]

Breath of fresh air in that. I agree. I also see one more effect: It gives those who supported him a feeling of security - someone is looking out for them and protecting them.

Exactly, I had a nice conversation with an alt-right supporter yesterday and they said they supported the ban because it would make America safer. I pointed out the famous Benjamin Franklin quote

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

For at least some of them, I think they are already there. They seem to be prisoners of their own fear.