Researchers find "substantial evidence" that the universe may be a hologram

[Makson]

I have yet to see one comment which proves the unreality of the article and it is in the heading.

'Researchers find "substantial evidence" that the universe may be a hologram.'
It MAY be something different, therefore the "substantial evidence" isn't evidence of anything, it is at the most something never seen before.
In the news we see or read, in various articles of daily story-gathering the words 'could', 'may', 'possibly' are used too often and the articles lack facts.
Listen to a weather report on radio or TV, "It could rain tomorrow in 'your' area." is used by many reporters.

 

[Someone8MyPosts]

Awesome...dream me up a busty wench please.

 

[captaincranky]

Its a quote from an Adam Sandler movie. Billy Madison? The one where he needs to go back to school to prove he can run his father's company when he retires.

When you come right down to it, most Adam Sandler movies aren't actually that good.

The only "reality" in this topic, is Drew Barrymore isn't that pretty, and Adam Sandler isn't that funny. Hence, Sandler's universe has been proven to be collapsing, since the two of them starred in, "50 First Dates".

Whoever came up with "this year's model" of the holographic universe, must have smoked about an ounce of the best weed ever, while watching a 3D printer puke out a snow globe.

 

[captaincranky]

Wow, I loved all these comments from these physicists wannabes... it just made me laugh and cry at the same time - (no quantum pun intended, lol...)

However I must point out "Ockham's razor"... Friar William has a very good point "as for when all nonsense stands alone one must be it and consider it" - now, I'm not saying this is right but I'm not saying this is wrong either.

Not until proven otherwise should we pass judgement.

To all who post here prove me you are conscious for none of you will.
...And I will enjoy see you try and fail miserably!

Spare us the condescending rhetoric, sil vous plait. After all, in dispensing six overly ornate and flowery sentences, all you've really said is, "I dunno".

An alternative theory is Zarathustra farted out the entire universe, and we can use Occam's razor to justify that nonsense as well

 

[Makson]

Spare us the condescending rhetoric, sil vous plait. After all, in dispensing six overly ornate and flowery sentences, all you've really said is, "I dunno".

An alternative theory is Zarathustra farted out the entire universe, and we can use Occam's razor to justify that nonsense as well

Quae calcatae indignans insania in regnum.

 

[cliffordcooley]

Quae calcatae indignans insania in regnum.

With me only understanding English, that makes as much sense to me as the thread topic.

 

[captaincranky]

With me only understanding English, that makes as much sense to me as the thread topic.

"And she stepped up in a rage and hatred in the kingdom"..........Or not. Google translate is your friend....um mostly. That's Google's whole sentence translation

For just this little snippet, "insania in regnum", I'm content with my informal, un-scholarly translation "insanity reigns".

Or this, which makes a lot more sense, done word at a time, is my translation: "What stepped up indignity, insanity in reign". (In English we'd use the progressive tense reigning or ruling .

 

[Makson]

With me only understanding English, that makes as much sense to me as the thread topic.

You have the ability to learn, learn, learn....and understand, EASILY .... type translate in browser, type "Latin to English" and you will part way UP the ladder of wisdom in real life.

 

[Andys]

The universe is spread out as a space time warp, we know from Doppler effect or the red shift that distant stars and galaxies are moving farther away from us. Moving ever further in a rapidly expanding universe to where? If everything was expanding further away then we would not even exist because matter would become extremely rare with vast areas of empty space between us which is not the case because looking from a bigger perspective everything seems to exist forever in perfect harmony. So expanding it is but not like a balloon in every direction. The direction cannot be outward - that brings us to the question what is the boundary of the universe which we know does not exist because that conclusion would nullify the assumption itself - that if there is a boundary then what is beyond? That also answers the question about the expanding universe - the expansion is happening in another dimension which is not yet understood by us. Probably it is simultaneously expanding and 'turning' inwards in another dimension just as anything sucked into a black hole emerges out the other end. We know black holes are spread out across the entire universe and within its vicinity all your laws of physics fail as time itself gets trapped inside its intense gravitational force.

Thus scientists continue to design new models to help explain seemingly paradoxical observations. This theory of a 'hologram' fits well with many observations however, to my knowledge it does not explain time completely, meaning it only explains in one area of the observable universe but not all areas. As I said earlier the universe is dotted with entire galaxies spread out across aeons of space. Any attempt at explain the 'entire universe' is bound to be fruitless.

 

[Makson]

The universe is spread out as a space time warp, we know from Doppler effect or the red shift that distant stars and galaxies are moving farther away from us. Moving ever further in a rapidly expanding universe to where? If everything was expanding further away then we would not even exist because matter would become extremely rare with vast areas of empty space between us which is not the case because looking from a bigger perspective everything seems to exist forever in perfect harmony. So expanding it is but not like a balloon in every direction. The direction cannot be outward - that brings us to the question what is the boundary of the universe which we know does not exist because that conclusion would nullify the assumption itself - that if there is a boundary then what is beyond? That also answers the question about the expanding universe - the expansion is happening in another dimension which is not yet understood by us. Probably it is simultaneously expanding and 'turning' inwards in another dimension just as anything sucked into a black hole emerges out the other end. We know black holes are spread out across the entire universe and within its vicinity all your laws of physics fail as time itself gets trapped inside its intense gravitational force.

Thus scientists continue to design new models to help explain seemingly paradoxical observations. This theory of a 'hologram' fits well with many observations however, to my knowledge it does not explain time completely, meaning it only explains in one area of the observable universe but not all areas. As I said earlier the universe is dotted with entire galaxies spread out across aeons of space. Any attempt at explain the 'entire universe' is bound to be fruitless.

No-one know how, if at all the universe is expanding or otherwise. Sure, peeking through a 'scope and applying the basics of scientific research with calculations and definitive answers from what is witnessed, based on those calculations is given as an answer, but only within the concept of 'what is, and what isn't' possible in the 'still primitive' clever minds of our top scientists.
The 'Big Bang THEORY' is just that, a theory. OUR universe is not ours, there would have been matter existing to create a Big Bang, therefore it is NOT a beginning of anything, it is only an assumption of possibilities..... based again on the miniscule knowledge and understanding by Earth's scientists of how little we know about the centre of our being, The Universe.
When any article is published on any subject, look for the word 'could' in the article, many people miss it and take the article as fact, as you may see or hear weather reports, "It COULD rain, snow, be hotter than hot tomorrow."
Assuming is useless.......we want the facts, if they are not available .... we will wait until they are available and act accordingly.
Mankind COULD be on Mars by the year 2020, why, the Martians left and went to a better planet......40 million years ago.