Steam Big Picture mode previewed, Valve goes after consoles

Julio Franco

Posts: 9,090   +2,042
Staff member

Today, Valve will launch the beta of Big Picture mode, a version of Steam designed for your television. That's right. The de facto central hub of PC gaming is now designed to run while you're lounging in your living room—and with a controller, no less. I've tried out Big Picture. It's sleek, intuitive, and groundbreaking in several ways.

No, this new "Steam TV" isn't going to make our video game consoles go away. It's not going to turn your Xbox into a doorstop or obviate your PS3. But Big Picture could be a crucial first step toward making PC gaming more accessible, more convenient, and more suited for living rooms than ever before.

Here are the basics: this afternoon, when Big Picture goes live, you'll be able to push a button and turn Steam into an entirely new interface. It sort of looks like the dashboard on an Xbox 360, minus the advertisements and other clutter that can make that system so irritating to navigate. And it allows you to do almost everything you can do on vanilla Steam: you can buy games, browse the web, and even chat with your friends using the platform's standard in-game overlay.

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.

The fonts, icons, and menus are all large enough to be comfortably viewed on a big-screen television, and the prompts are designed for a game controller. You can use Big Picture on your normal monitor with a mouse and keyboard, but that would defeat the purpose: this is an interface designed for your living room. Because the living room, Valve says, is where most people prefer playing video games.

And maybe, just maybe, if fans seem to want it, and if it makes financial sense, the people who make Half-Life will use Big Picture to create their own version of a video game console.

Steam Box 720

Valve isn't happy with today's gaming consoles. They made that quite clear to me as we sat in one of the back rooms of their Seattle office in late August, looking at Big Picture mode in action.

See, the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 are walled gardens. You can't open them up or modify their insides. Developers can't release new updates or patches to their games without going through a restrictive, bureaucractic certification process. Nothing about these systems is open at all, and Valve doesn't like that.

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.A Kotaku mock-up of what Steam's Big Picture could look like running on your television.

Still, consoles have some advantages over computers. They're cheaper. More accessible. And you can play them on your sofa, feet propped up, a comfy controller in your hands. It's not so easy to do that with a computer.

At least not yet.

"We're confident in some things that customers want," Valve's Greg Coomer, head of the small team that designed and developed Big Picture mode, told me in his office. "They want a full-screen experience. They want to be in the living room. They want to use a game controller. They wanna have a social gaming experience. And we have this platform that lets us ship a significant portion of that experience."

Valve: "If it's getting involved in shipping some kind of hardware, then we will get involved in doing that if we need to."

While Big Picture won't "connect all the dots," Coomer said, it will make it easier for gamers to play Valve's games—and the vast array of games that Valve supports on Steam—in the comfort of their living rooms.

I ask the obvious question: is this the first step toward Valve making a console of their own? Maybe the Steam Box that has been rumored (and repeatedly shot down) for months now?

"What we really want is to ship [Big Picture mode] and then learn," Coomer said. "So we want to find out what people value about that. How they make use of it. When they make use of it. Whether it's even a good idea for the broadest set of customers or not. And then decide what to do next.

"So it could be that the thing that really makes sense is to build the box that you're describing. But we really don't have a road map. And we think we're going to learn a tremendous amount through this first release."

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.Seen at Valve HQ: Printed prototypes of Steam's Big Picture mode, including a Kotaku shout-out (complete with fake article text).

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.

No plans. But Steam's Big Picture mode is step #1 of an open-ended gameplan that could eventually lead to the company building—or stamping their name on—some sort of gaming console in the future.

What Valve really wants to know is what their users do with this new feature. Will people lug bulky computer towers back and forth between their desks and their living rooms? Will they use their televisions as second monitors? Will they buy dedicated gaming computers to sit next to the TV and run nothing but Steam? (You can toggle a setting that boots up Steam Big Picture as soon as you turn on your PC, effectively turning it into a Steam console.)

Or will fans ignore Big Picture entirely?

"Each individual gamer is going to have to decide in the short term whether the value that Big Picture brings is something they want to configure for themselves," Coomer said. "And for some users it's going to be quite easy. For some users it might not be worth it yet. But that's one of the things we're going to find out when we ship. And then over time, I think we're going to figure out which of those scenarios, or what ways do customers really want us to get involved in solving the rest of the problems that, say, our software can't solve for them.

"And if it's getting involved in shipping some kind of hardware, then we will get involved in doing that if we need to."

Lots of hypothetical possibilities there. Valve could team up with some third-party manufacturer and start selling a Steam-branded bundle, for example, that ships with a controller and an affordable mid-tier computer that runs Big Picture right out of the box. Or maybe Valve could work with an open-source hardware platform like the recently-funded Ouya. (In case you're wondering: No, Coomer says they haven't had any conversations with the folks who make Ouya.)

What matters more is that Big Picture works as promised. And from what I've tried out so far, I don't think fans will be disappointed.

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.

A Virtual Keyboard That Doesn't Suck

In some ways, Big Picture is just like an Xbox 360's dashboard. In others, it's not. And the system's biggest feature is one that I imagine will be copied quite a bit over the next few years: a total redesign of the virtual keyboard.

On most consoles, you're stuck with a QWERTY keyboard that you have to painstakingly
manipulate by dragging a cursor around the screen and selecting one letter or number at a time.

Steam Big Picture's keyboard looks more like a lotus flower (and you can see it in action right below this paragraph). In order to select keys, you move your left thumbstick in one of eight standard directions, then pick one of the buttons on the right side of your controller. When I looked at the mode, we were using a standard Xbox 360 controller, and each of the four colored buttons represented a different letter. So to press M, N, O, or P, for example, you just tilt the joystick diagonally right-down and hit the corresponding button.

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.

Already this gives you instant access to every character in a way that a virtual QWERTY keyboard can't. And the cool thing about this lotus is that it's not awful. In fact, it's actually kind of great. It's intuitive and quick. Seconds after picking up the controller and playing around with the interface, I was writing sentences at a solid, if not perfect pace. It can't quite match a physical keyboard, but it's better than any other virtual typing I've ever tried. A Valve team member proudly noted that when people have tested it out, "they're almost instantly faster than [when using] QWERTY."

TWO SCREENS? Nintendo has their Wii U, Microsoft has Smart Glass, and Sony has Vita-PS3 cross-compatibility. I asked Valve's Greg Coomer if they, like all of those other big companies, feel like the future of gaming could lie in dual-screen play.

"We are really interested in it but it hasn't been any of the focus in our work," he said. "Having a secondary experience, driving the primary experience, augmenting it with stuff that's social but ancillary—all those things are great, it's just not at the front of our priority list right now."

(When I ask the Valve staff sitting with me how the hell nobody has implemented something like this first, they have no answer. "We're surprised nobody has," one said.)

Navigating the interface is also rather easy. You can use a controller's trigger buttons to zoom around your game library, shop for new games (and take advantage of Steam's frequent discounts and sales), and interact with your Steam friends.

Fittingly, Big Picture's store will also highlight some of the games that are most suitable for your controller. You can even browse the internet, a function included, but not often used in today's gaming consoles. Coomer notes that the staff tried particularly hard to make a web browser that could actually be navigable with a controller, and they seem to have succeeded, although it's still not quite as pleasant as using a mouse.

Like on normal Steam, you can even multi-task within Big Picture, switching back and forth between a game and your browser without minimizing to the desktop at all.

Future plans for Big Picture mode include auto-correct, context awareness—"When you're in a web browser, it should know that you might want to put 'dot com' at the end of your address," Coomer said—and, in the distant future, some way to support cooperative split-screen mode, so multiple people can sit down in the same living room and simultaneously use their individual Steam accounts.

As for hardware? Some sort of game-changing, earth-shattering, open-source Steam Box that combines the power and flexibility of a computer with the affordability and accessibility of a console?

Valve Is Bringing Steam To Your TV Today. Watch Out, Consoles.

Let's not hold our breath. Valve still hasn't stopped running on Valve Time. But if Big Picture is the first step, it's a significant one. And after seeing Steam's TV mode in action, I'm tempted to go out and get a new desktop PC solely for my living room, just to play cheap, high-quality Steam games, to hook up and use alongside my Wii, Xbox, and PlayStation.

Five years from now, though? Maybe Steam will be the only console we need.

Republished with permission. Jason Schreier is a contributing editor at Kotaku.

Permalink to story.

 
Very interesting - I can see this really taking off as streaming of pretty much everything is rapidly becoming the norm. And looks like they've really thought out the menu system making it as about as ***** proof as possible. Although I have a beast gaming PC, it would be nice to play some games (like Dirt) on the sofa with a controller.

One question I have is at what resolution will these games be played at? The native resolution of the TV (1080p or 720p) or something else? Also, what kind of lag may be involved.

But I sure like this a helluva lot more than console boxes.
 
Or instead of being a consumer waiting for steam to come out with a solution you can not be a lazy arse and just connect your big screen to your PC... I've had this setup since 2007, way before this was even conceptualized. You know, the best way to experience a computer on a big screen is to actually connect the computer to it, trying to use either PS3 or Xbox to browse the internet without a keyboard is just a waste of time even trying to use a stick as a mouse is laughable. Steam can take as long as they want with their "Big Picture" because even when it does come out, I can already assure you I prefer the current version. People have eyes, most of which that work, you don't have to make things take up so much space on screen. To this date I have yet to find a better solution than I already have, a PC just has an infinite range of customization. A closed platform simply doesn't cut it.
 
Although I have a beast gaming PC, it would be nice to play some games (like Dirt) on the sofa with a controller.

Then why don't you? The Xbox controller works with most windows games without any modification, just need the wireless adapter. Your beast gaming PC must have HDMI out, get a 50ft HDMI cable and bam, your playing Dirt of your sofa.

One question I have is at what resolution will these games be played at? The native resolution of the TV (1080p or 720p) or something else? Also, what kind of lag may be involved.

This would depend on both the game and the hardware running it. The menu system is sure to be 1080p, if your running on a console it will be most likely limited to 720p in game. With steams system I couldn't tell you if there would be any lag. With my solution there is no lag, nothing is faster than being hardwired. All this could be yours, just need to make it happen.
 
"Then why don't you?" LOL...because I've been lazy. There's really no reason why I can't. Maybe that can be a weekend project for me and certainly won't take much. I'll also need to get a wireless keyboard, mouse and some sort of board to set them on for my lap for those games where a controller won't work. I have a good buddy who has a 120" projection HD display and that's how he does his gaming. A really fun setup.
 
Valve can say whatever they want about their reason to support consoles. They fact is they are greedy like everybody else. That is the primary reason.

Also a low cost laptop with a decent gpu in it such as an AMD A8-3500M could easily be hooked up to a tv and a gamepad plugged in, meanwhile having the superior advantages of a keyboard, powerful OS, portability, etc. Why continue dumping money into an ancient console or even a new console that has the same limitations as the last gen? Put it into a gaming laptop or portable pc and the console industry could easily be forgotten.

Edit: I guess Adhmuz summed it up when he said, "To this date I have yet to find a better solution than I already have, a PC just has an infinite range of customization."
 
That virtual keyboard is freaking brilliant. Im not kidding. its things like that that make me appreciates little innovations like that.
 
Would be cool if it were it's own OS with compatibility for Windows games. That would make PCs and consoles the same price, nearly.
 
Eddo22 said:
Valve can say whatever they want about their reason to support consoles. They fact is they are greedy like everybody else. That is the primary reason.
Valve are a business, providing a service that people want to use, while making a reasonable profit is the very core of business. I have not seen any evidence of them resorting to any "dirty" tactics as some other big names have been in recent times, so I'm not entirely sure that they deserve this level of animosity.

spydercanopus said:
Would be cool if it were it's own OS with compatibility for Windows games. That would make PCs and consoles the same price, nearly.
A "Steambox" that runs Steam software straight out of the box would almost have to be based off PC architecture in order to get the most out of the existing software library. I wouldn't go so far as to say consoles and PCs would cost the same though. Skyrim, for example, on a $500 console or a $500 PC will still look and perform vastly different than on, say, a $2000 PC.
 
One thing to consider: the eye candy of this software is awesome.
Another thing to consider: is it going to have massive updates minute-to-minute of the main application (just like happens on the pc - it freaks me so much) and it's going to consume huge ammounts of memory just like it's consuming on my quad core pc?
Also, is it going to have a poor scrolling just like on the steam pc version?
 
Been waiting on this so I can build a dedicated gaming mini-itx box to leave hooked up to my 50" plasma. Will look nice sitting next to my 360 and PS3.
 
Back