TechSpot

Supreme Court rules against Aereo in landmark television debate

By Shawn Knight
Jun 25, 2014
Post New Reply
  1. The way we watch television in this country isn't going to change anytime soon. The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that television streaming startup Aereo violates copyright laws by capturing over-the-air signals using an array of mini antennas and delivering...

    Read more
     
  2. JC713

    JC713 TS Evangelist Posts: 7,029   +913

    Ouch. RIP Aereo.
     
  3. Aereo will be missed. I loved their service. It was the wave of the future for television.
     
  4. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 3,183   +767

    Since when is the consumer ever supposed to win? It's all about the money, nothing more.
     
  5. insect

    insect TS Booster Posts: 215   +56

    Maybe I don't understand this Aereo thing completely... Why would anyone pay for something that is broadcast over the air for free?
    Were they capturing paid service signals? If so, then to me it seems clear that is a violation of copyright. Take for example, I buy a book then head to the local park and start reading it aloud. Someone near me is writing it all down word for word. That person near me would still be in violation of copyright.
     
  6. amstech

    amstech TechSpot Enthusiast Posts: 881   +231

    Just a minor setback.
    The days of people dropping $100-$200 monthly for 1600 channels they don't watch are coming to an end. Most users today want only 5-20 select channels and internet. If cable providers didn't package/bundle TV in, the amount of users who needed/wanted regular TV would substantially drop.
    We are changing our plan from 2.5MBps and Digital + HD channels to 5.0MBps and basic TV. Commercial television (other then sports and cooking shows) sucks.
     
    cliffordcooley and Darkshadoe like this.
  7. TadMSTR

    TadMSTR TS Rookie Posts: 17

    They were capturing free over the air signals and retransmitting over the Internet, commercials and all. They technically were not breaking the law as each customer was assigned an antenna. It would be the same as having the antenna hooked up at the customer's home. Instead the antenna was located somewhere else, with better signal coverage. They charged for the service of the DVR and better signal coverage. They were not charging for the programming. However, the TV execs didn't see it that way.
     
  8. insect

    insect TS Booster Posts: 215   +56

    Thanks for explaining, but why then didn't people setup their own rabbit ears (instead of $8 per month)? *shrugs* The internet provides it all without commercials.
     
  9. Scshadow

    Scshadow TS Maniac Posts: 368   +52

    I see the government is still the entertainment industry's *****. Move along, nothing new to see here.
     
    Darkshadoe likes this.
  10. Solitaire888

    Solitaire888 TS Rookie

    As was mentioned, it was for getting better service. In some cases, people were getting channels that were out of their area as well.
     
    cliffordcooley likes this.
  11. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 10,824   +922

    At the end of every NFL OTA network broadcast, the copyright terms specifically state, "this telecast MAY NOT be rebroadcast without the express permission of the National Football League".

    Now, if Aereo was doing anything other than "rebroadcasting", wrapped up in some snot bag BS, semantic, reinterpretation of that declaration, I'd really like you to show me how.

    And it would seem, The Supreme Court feels the same way.

    Amazon thought they were going to float this, "delivery drones are really model airplanes", garbage past the FAA. That didn't work either.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2014
    misor likes this.
     
  12. Darkshadoe

    Darkshadoe TS Guru Posts: 566   +105

    "Take for example, I buy a book then head to the local park and start reading it aloud."

    You also would be in violation of copyright for "sharing"
     
  13. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 10,824   +922

    It is sort of ironic what we now consider "copyright violations", are many things we considered "rights" in years past.

    The trouble sets in when these days you, "read aloud", you are doing so to the entire world's population via the internet.

    Take my example of the OTA broadcast of a football game. I don't think any judge would rule against you for infringement for inviting a few friends over to watch the game, but to rebroadcast it for money, that a whole 'nuther story.
     
  14. tonylukac

    tonylukac TS Maniac Posts: 914   +22

    So apple is violating the constitution selling ipods/iphones that hold stolen songs?
     
  15. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 10,824   +922

    Remember, iPods don't steal songs, people do.

    Much in the same way that iPhones don't kill people, the things they run into while talking on them do.
     
    misor likes this.
  16. MilwaukeeMike

    MilwaukeeMike TS Evangelist Posts: 2,129   +731

    Seriously? I'm about 90% sure you're trolling. It's all about the money? For who, because for Aereo, it's all about the money too.

    I'm actually shocked 3 supreme court justices voted in favor of this. Stealing isn't legal because a) technology makes it easy and b) we, as consumers, benefit. It's the definition of corruption to think something that is obviously wrong is suddenly OK because it's to your benefit. I'd love it if Aereo were legal, I'd sign up immediately, because every ounce of common sense I have tells me this is the most obviously illegal service since Napster and I'd be scared it would be cancelled faster than that Popcorn app that was out for about 6 hours.
     
  17. Darkshadoe

    Darkshadoe TS Guru Posts: 566   +105

    "Take my example of the OTA broadcast of a football game. I don't think any judge would rule against you for infringement for inviting a few friends over to watch the game, but to rebroadcast it for money, that a whole 'nuther story."

    I agree with you but the whole 'copyright infringement' issue has been horribly bastardized. For example, restaurants can't sing Happy Birthday anymore and record companies wanted businesses to pay a fee for listening to the radio during work hours because several people could hear and enjoy it. So I am not sure if a judge would or would not rule against you if you did invite people over to watch the game. These days it is hard to tell.
     
    TadMSTR likes this.
  18. cliffordcooley

    cliffordcooley TechSpot Paladin Posts: 6,123   +1,523

    Death to everyone involved for shutting down a service that was not available elsewhere!
     
  19. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 3,183   +767

    Me trolling??? Never.:) But you're probably right, I don't really understand what Aereo was up to in the 1st place apart from trying to make easy money.
     
  20. rvnwlfdroid

    rvnwlfdroid TS Rookie Posts: 82   +6

    So what's next.... For all of the people out there that download TV episodes and justify it by saying to yourselves it's an over the air broadcast so there's nothing wrong with it... Guess What... Your Next... :p
     
  21. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 10,824   +922

    And like the proverbial perfect wave, it seems to have broken over you, and now is gone......:'( You probably didn't have your, "channel surf board", waxed correctly.....:oops:

    ( I think I did some great work with metaphor in that post, don't you)?
     
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2014


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.