Hi raybay. Thank you for the reply. When I bought this PC about 18 months ago it had 512 MB RAM, which I replaced with two cards of Crucial DDR2 RAM, 1024 MB each, in the ASUSTeK Computer INC. P5VD2-MX 1.XX Motherboard, and have never had any problems, until the Microsoft updates recently which included IE 7.
I have always suspected IE 7 of being the problem although I have never used it unless I had to. Just after posting my string, I upgraded to IE 8 RC1 and the "Memory could not be 'read'" error has not recurred since then.
I also watched my TaskManager for 40 minutes,and recorded the following, which mean little to me, but you will know what the readings represent: During the idle, CPU usage was static between 0% and 7% - half way through the exercise I opened explorer.exe (which is one of the programs that faults, though it is not in use at the time of faulting. The other is Webshots ScreenSaver which is disabled anyway.) I also opened Outlook Express and opened some emails.
I returned to idle for the remainder of the time. The page file started at 547 going up to 702 by the end of the vigil.
Other TaskMan readings were:
Totals: Handles: 10536; Threads 543; Processes: 54.
Physical Memory: Total: 2095532; Available 1509160; System Cache: 821492. Comit Charge(K): Total: 70552; Limit: 4034140; Peak: 130l796.
Kernel Memory: Total: 181656; Paged 169308;
Nonpaged: 13372. Processes 53
Comit Charge: 702/3939.
At the end of the 40 minutes, the PageFile reading was: 702.
Well, it is now almost 2 hours since I installed IE 8 RC1 and still no "Memory could not be 'read'" error. from the two faulting programs. Will have to wait and see what happens down the line.
I am sure the two Crucial DDR2 sticks are OK, but have no way to test them.
I use Avant Browser and it's very fast, and my PC is very responsive otherwise. I find Firefox slow and sluggish, so don't use it. Kindest regards, and thanks to TechSpot.