TechSpot

USB 3.0-equipped PCs due before end of the year

By Jos
Jul 1, 2009
  1. Following the delivery of final specifications and first host controller samples, it appears that the SuperSpeed Universal Serial Bus standard, better known as USB 3.0, is about ready for a commercial rollout. According to a Nikkei report, Taiwanese PC vendors will be among the first to release computers equipped with the next-gen interface, which promises up to 5Gbps transfer speeds, or roughly ten times the speed of USB 2.0.

    Read the whole story
     
  2. Route44

    Route44 TechSpot Ambassador Posts: 12,171   +37

    Wow! And can you imagine the cost of first generation flash drives to take advantage of the 3.0? :D
     
  3. Darth Shiv

    Darth Shiv TS Evangelist Posts: 1,184   +177

    Rout44 - startup cost is always there... who cares? Once it starts going mainstream costs drop dramatically anyway.
     
  4. OneArmedScissor

    OneArmedScissor TS Rookie Posts: 49

    I don't mean to rain on the parade, but much as is the case with SATA III, it sounds cool until you stop and consider the not-so-mysterious absence of devices on the way that could potentially use the increased bandwidth.

    The storage medium, whether HDD or SSD, is still the weakest link, just as is the case with SATA/eSATA.

    Every time I see "USB 3.0" written somewhere, I start to think about how nice it would be to copy bazillions of GBs in an instant, but that's a ways down the road for it to be truly advantageous, even for SSDs.
     
  5. raybay

    raybay TS Evangelist Posts: 10,716   +6

    Yes, thank you, OneArmedScissor.

    The enemy of good is better.
     
  6. red1776

    red1776 Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe Posts: 5,913   +92

    that's true oneArmed, but doesn't the chicken or the egg have to come first? I know what your saying and it is down the road, however, its kinda like saying that before turntables were invented, people used to sit around with their albums wishing someone would invent the record player?

    @ Raybay, what does your quote mean? do you disapprove of furthering USB, and think that a new transfer architecture is in order?
     
  7. OneArmedScissor

    OneArmedScissor TS Rookie Posts: 49

    I agree that it's nice that to have it ready to go beforehand, but I think it's extremely misleading that the way it's already been hyped up for months is by showing off that it can transfer 25GB in 70 seconds, and things of that nature. That would take two fast SSDs in RAID, or a very large array of HDDs. Neither of those scenarios make a lick of sense for the application.

    Affordable, somewhat decent size, USB 3.0 SSDs will be a possibility within two more generations from where SSDs are now, but even when we get there, people are probably still going to be wondering where their 350MB/s is, and that's still pretty much only half of the maximum bandwidth.

    It's great that they gave it so much headroom, but that's nearly all USB 3.0's "speed" amounts to. I guess it just irks me that it's already being overstated by so much, when it isn't even available. That makes me wonder how outlandish the advertising is going to get when it's actually here...
     
  8. tengeta

    tengeta TS Enthusiast Posts: 632

    I have had no USB 2.0 device live up to its ports full speed, I have no reason to believe USB 3 would be any different.
     
  9. Rick

    Rick TechSpot Staff Posts: 6,305   +52 Staff Member

    ... Although even if it is terribly inefficient, it is still easily faster than any practical consumer data device out there: even if you half it.

    5Gbps = 596 MiB/s
     
  10. TJGeezer

    TJGeezer TS Enthusiast Posts: 385   +10

    Isn't the "enemy of good" supposed to be "good enough"? At least that would apply to this discussion, if you grant that USB 3.0 is "good". But if it's mostly hype, as many here seem to feel, it isn't even particularly relevant, except maybe as a wishful target for storage technology. I gotta think the skeptics make a good argument.
     
  11. @onearmedscissor

    Actually, that's incorrect; USB 2.0 is the bottleneck and even conventional hard drives are capable of much faster transfer speeds.
     
     
  12. Badfinger

    Badfinger TS Rookie Posts: 160

    What the hell took so long for this?
     
Topic Status:
Not open for further replies.


Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...


Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.