G
Star Trek... easily. I've always been more a fan of science fiction than fantasy. (And before anyone tries to argue that Star Wars is Science Fiction, just because it is in a distant galaxy doesn't mean there aren't swords, magic, and destiny. It has far more in common with fantasy than science fiction.)
That being said... I think Babylon 5 might be even more epic that Star Trek... and I love a little bit of SeaQuest (Star Trek Underwater).
Probably because Ben Browder and Claudia Black were the most unlikely couple in the history of film, not just science fiction film.Star Trek TNG made the show a franchise. And why has no one mentioned Farscape?
At least the first four seasons. Going with the theme, I'd say Farscape, Firefly, B5, and Red Dwarf. I'd probably rate the flawed BSG above the Star Trek franchise (DS9 seemed the best of the bunch for consistency IMO). Not really a Star Wars fan- the blatant commercialization and the less than interesting later instalments tend to ruin any legacy it had achieved.Babylon 5.
When given 2 choices - pick the 3rd option of you're own making
Pretty good on screen chemistry, as there seemed with the whole cast. I'd still rate the Scorpius character the best written villain in TV SF, certainly more complex a character than you'd find on virtually any other SF show.Probably because Ben Browder and Claudia Black were the most unlikely couple in the history of film, not just science fiction film.
Possibly because the subject of this thread is Star Wars or Star Trek not name your favorite sci-fi show.Star Trek TNG made the show a franchise. And why has no one mentioned Farscape?
Perhaps, but being the pig that I am, I'd like to see Ben and Claudia rebooted triple X style. Something along the lines of, "Baby Face Ben meets Raven the Dom". In any event, being the Schweinhund that I am, I'm only into science fiction for the ingenues. A couple of Josh Whedon's semi-failures gave us some of the prettiest women in sci-fi. At the very least, some of those with the most sex appeal. Summer Glau, the, (real life), ballerina, with deep rooted emotional issues in "Firefly" and later as a terminator in, "Terminator: The Sarah Conner Chronicles". Whedon also brought us Amy Acker, another complex, disturbed, character in the currently running TV serial, "Person of Interest". An then there's Eliza Dushku in his short lived, "Dollhouse".Pretty good on screen chemistry, as there seemed with the whole cast. I'd still rate the Scorpius character the best written villain in TV SF, certainly more complex a character than you'd find on virtually any other SF show.
I tacked this on for you, just so my post would wend its way back to the topic.Possibly because the subject of this thread is Star Wars or Star Trek not name your favorite sci-fi show.
The Star Trek original series grabbed many of its plot lines, from the hot button issues of the hip era. For example, one episode was about two beings, the last of their kinds, fighting to the death across across the galaxy, because they were both black and white, but on opposite sides of their bodies. Ergo, Star Trek was at its inception a morality play with heavy social commentary, from a reasonably liberal viewpoint. Here, very obviously, was a commentary on the civil rights issue and racism, with little obfuscation attempted.I like them both equal . I think my mind would be a lot more closed without Star wars and Star trek . Think what kind of world we would have if no one ever said Luke I am your father or Beam me up Scotty . I don't think people realize the effect of movies like these on a young mans mind. Luke and Captain Kirk show us that we all can be hero's and Han Solo teaches that we don't have to be perfect to be good people . Spok shows us how to use logic and reason over emotion and fear.I could go on but I for one think I am a better person for being a fan of both . Live long and prosper .
Oh, I got the point. My point is that it was liberal progressive propaganda, and pushed the bankrupt idea of multiculturalism - that all cultures have equal value. Look at the instances in TNG that the Prime Directive is violated, it is to push the agenda of which you speak.Star Trek TOS. TNG and DS9 were too filled with Hollyweird liberal BS - all cultures are valued and we don't kill the evil prisoners bent on our destruction.
Kirk knew when to kick *** and take names.
Star Wars = Magic. It's not SF; even if you change the F to Fantasy, there's less science in it than in Big Bang Theory.
The Force.....hrummmph
You're kind of missing the point about Star Trek and multiculturalism. It was a common theme throughout the OS representing Rodenberry and Coon's vision of what the UN could do to keep the peace.
"Dave Allen at Large" brings back some fond memories of watching the last show of the programming day, then the National Anthem at the signoff of the station......As someone who's pre-teen years were in the early 70's, I became more of a Star Trek fan. I had several models I built, and many books (Enterprise blueprints, Federation manual, etc...). I used to even get and read the novels through the mid 90's. I have followed all of the movies and various series.
That said, I started watching Doctor Who in the mid 80's (WTTW Chicago, 11PM after 'Monty Python' and 'Dave Allen at Large'), and became a big Whovian. I also used to follow the 'Continuing' and 'Lost' Adventures novels. In fact, I stopped reading Star Trek novels due to their low quality compared to the DW novels (I can barely remember any ST novels, but still vividly remember the DW Lost Adventure with the Doctor and the Venusians). I only stopped reading the novels when Target books lost their contract and it took over a year before the BBC got US distribution for their own novels.
I can also add I remember watching DW on the day the hacker took over the transmitter."Dave Allen at Large" brings back some fond memories of watching the last show of the programming day, then the National Anthem at the signoff of the station......