Weekend Open Forum: Will you try the Windows 10 Technical Preview?

From the comments above I get the impression that W10 is an improvement on W8 or W8.1 however I will not be rushing out to buy it when it becomes available. I am more than happy to stick with W7 for the following reasons:

  • I use it at work and at home.
  • It does everything I need
  • Why spend money when it is not necessary
  • My PC boots up from cold very quickly thanks to SSD
  • Don't need to learn how to use new version
I might consider it for a new build but that would not be for a while.
 
Have had it running a few days now, so far so good, except not picking up an external HD that I confirmed good on another OS.
Reboot fixed the missing hard drive, not sure what caused it to begin with but its working now.
 
I am running it right now as I'm commenting,,like the new tiled start menu,,but the general performance is jittery,glitchy,,stops and goes,the file explorer is crap,,,like it's out of control,,type of stuff,,doesn't work very good,,,program icons in the taskbars jump around for no reason,,,,got gremlins and no windows 10 pictures anywheres,no vids or even sample music,,and the non responsive file explorer makes it hard to add them,,but I did get it done,,,,,I think it's got a buggy refresh rate problem,,,,
 
Its Technical Preview only, no need to try because its a commercial demo version only.
 
I've lost my ability to be excited by Microsoft's OS releases since windows 7. I'll be sticking with windows 8.1 + Start8 + Modern Mix, I've grown to like the under the hood Improvements of Windows 8.1 over Windows 7, and the aforementioned additions to 8.1 make the user experience just like Windows 7, I'm a happy camper with this setup.

If there were any truly innovative features I'd give Windows 10 a go, but it seems to me that Microsoft is beginning the slow back peddle from the disaster that is Metro. Here's a hint Microsoft, you missed the boat on the "Store Ecosystem" by a good 5 years. You're not Apple, stop trying to be, it's going to bankrupt your company, stick to what your customers want! (Separate Desktop, Workstation, and Server experiences.
 
I am running it inside a Virtual Machine and so far, I am really liking it. This is how Windows 8 should've been like. MS you screwed once with Windows Vista and then again with Windows 8, try to learn from your mistakes for once and please listen to the end users.
 
I wasn't expecting much, but it's worthwhile imo. Put it on a spare Vector I had. There's a few mobile things or inconsistencies that I don't like so far which will likely be removed, like the forced start screen that you have to click in order to show an account/password prompt.

Overall, I'll be getting it in release. I still don't understand the fascination with kiddie pastel colors though that lack any detail. We spent all the years working on advanced 3D technology only to not use it.

I'll still keep 7 though on my main drive. 10 so far lacks a lot of the flow that made 7 just hands down work nearly in any situation.
 
I clean installed Win 10 preview on a separate drive. It installed on the drive I told it to, but put the boot-manager on my Windows 7 drive. No harm done, but next time I will disconnect all other drives but the one on which I intend installing the preview while it is being installed, The latest nVidia driver for Win 8.1 (64-bit) does work on it. An error pops up but it installs anyway. Battlefield 4 works good.
 
I am not enough of a geek to use alpha,beta or pre release windows though I have been known to dip into AOSPNightlies as any problems are soon remedied
 
Search button and desktops button are wasting task bar space. Hopefully the final version will allow you to remove each. The new start menu is ok... I think the Windows 7 menu is still better, but I'll wait for the final version since it still may be improved. So far its pretty much Windows 8.1 with most of its interface awkwardness intact. As it is now I don't see it as a compelling reason to upgrade from 7.
 
Search button and desktops button are wasting task bar space. Hopefully the final version will allow you to remove each. The new start menu is ok... I think the Windows 7 menu is still better, but I'll wait for the final version since it still may be improved. So far its pretty much Windows 8.1 with most of its interface awkwardness intact. As it is now I don't see it as a compelling reason to upgrade from 7.

That's what I thought also. Visually, Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 are almost identical twins separated at birth. Except there is a start menu back. So Microsoft wants everybody to rush out and upgrade to Windows 10 now all for no other than reason than putting back something they stole from us to begin with. LOL. I love it!!! Phhhfffttt!!!!!!

I guess if I "forced" myself to use Windows 10 day in and day out for 6 months I could transform myself into one of the millions of other believers who love Windows 10. I must just be really lazy. I am gonna sit on Windows 7 for just a little longer.
 
There are a lot of GOOD things about 8 that get dismissed because the big points are 8 sucks because of Metro and Tiles. I'm not going to rehash the points here because its been done elsewhere in the forums (specifically windows 8 discussion sticky in Windows OS forum) - but the task manager and copy/move is quite a bit more informative and useful than that in 7 and prior.
 
Short answer:
And some of us still don't want to drive the fastest car in the world because it looks like a damn checker board box. Saying no to drugs doesn't mean go ahead and buy them but don't take them. I'm saying no to Metro squares in their current form.

Keep talking about what is hidden under the hood, and I will continue bashing the most obvious eyesore in the history of Windows. There are no under-hood features, if it doesn't produce pleasing cosmetics for everyone through out the whole GUI!
 
Well, you say Windows 10 gets rid of Metro but not really. Because I see square windows and pastel colors as part of the Metro UI. So, they took out parts of Metro. The flat look is still there. So, my comments seem pretty accurate to me. Windows 10 feels like 8.1 with a start menu and a couple of other improvements I am sure. The PC settings screen didn't change. It's just launched from the start menu now instead of the charms bar.

The operating system still feels like it has a man in the middle versus letting the user interact with the operating system directly. I think Microsoft wants it that way. I will probably never like it as much as Windows 7. But who knows. If Microsoft truly delivers on their intentions of a 'custom experience for each device' then it may have a stronger appeal to me someday.
Ok, well that is a better explanation. You didn't give me much to go on before.

They took out the boot to Metro, I'm not even sure if you can make full Metro happen again, but it certainly wasn't presented as an option to me during my setup of 10. As Captain pointed out, they can't TOTALLY remove it because it is admitting they were wrong.. As it stands now, it isn't a big deal.

Now you mention its still flat, well, sure thats the evolution of things right now. I think it is a bit unfair to ***** about the appearance of a new OS simply because you don't like it. I mean, you can ***** about it all you want, but things change visually almost all the time on OS releases, so complaining about a new look is something that always happens, so I'm not going to give any credit there.

Square windows in my idea is very great. Since it’s not eye candy, and it’s simple:

Windows Aero in Windows 8:


In Windows 8:
In comparison to Windows 7, the interface adopted a flatter look with almost no transparency effects, fewer rounded edges, and solid colored window borders designed to attract more attention to the content of a window.

Creating the Windows 8 user experience - Building Windows 8 - Site Home - MSDN Blogs

To complete the story, we updated the appearance of most common controls, such as buttons, check boxes, sliders, and the Ribbon. We squared off the rounded edges, cleaned away gradients, and flattened the control backgrounds to align with our chrome changes. We also tweaked the colors to make them feel more modern and neutral.

Also a friend of mine, told me this about the Metro UI in Windows 10:

“It’s good that you can remove metro apps from the start menu. It would be even better to be able to remove them from the OS though.

Notifications center, which is not available in this technical build, are, again, a bit of Metro UI they try to unite with the desktop environment, despite it being pretty useless to people who actually use the desktop environment. It’s good they improve them, but if it were me, I’d disable them altogether.
(just like virtual desktops. I’ve tried them on mac and linux, and wasn’t convinced. Basically alt-tabbing windows is just as convenient, and virtual desktops add another layer of switching which confuses me : instead of switching between windows you can switch between windows OR desktops, for basically the same purpose : displaying a window or another. But I guess that’s a marketing answer to people saying “look, Mac OS has virtual desktops and Windows hasn’t !”)”
 
Square windows in my idea is very great. Since it’s not eye candy, and it’s simple:....[ ]...
Modern life runs on eye candy, from the makeup counter to the new BMW. From the A line skirt to the zebra striped panties, eye candy rules! Eye candy cries out plaintively , "oh Lord, why hast thou forsaken me"?

And BTW, it's often difficult to determine where, "simple", leaves off, and, "stupid", begins. Case in point, at its most auspicious in the Metro interface.
 
Last edited:
Transparent command prompts and powershell windows is candy for me :) I love those additions. Also, being able to easily cut/paste/manage content from these windows is another huge plus.
 
In comparison to Windows 7, the interface adopted a flatter look with almost no transparency effects, fewer rounded edges, and solid colored window borders designed to attract more attention to the content of a window.

The more I read statements like this the more I believe that MS have lost their way. So I need my attention drawn to the content of the window? This is utter claptrap as I seldom look at the screen with just the icons showing. Most of the time all three monitors have programs opened. Email on the laptop screen, spreadsheets on monitor 1 and IE or accounts program on monitor 2. All the programs are pulled up from short-cut in the task bar at the foot of the screen. I seldom use the start menu or the window icons.
 
Back