also @ TechSpot: Razer brings the arcade experience home with the Atrox Arcade Stick

Which graphical OS needs the fewest RAM

Discussion in 'The Alternative OS' started by Beni, Jan 21, 2005.

  1. Beni Newcomer, in training

    Hi volks

    I often try new Operating systems, I'm trying to learn everything, at see the basics. So, right now I'm doing it all with multi-boot. Now, I'm currently thinking about the possibilities of VWWare. I'm thinkin about having one basic system, which don't need much RAM, and then starting the other Operating Systems thrue VMWare.

    Now, the question: Which OS would be the best? I'm currently thinking about BeOS, or OS/2. What do you think?
  2. Nodsu Newcomer, in training Posts: 9,431

    "best" meaning what?

    You might as well run DOS 6.22 with Windows 1.0. That setup would be satisfied with a 286 and 640KB of RAM..
  3. Beni Newcomer, in training

    Oky; Best = A stable OS, with a good and stable office, and the possibility to run vmware on it
  4. Nodsu Newcomer, in training Posts: 9,431

    VMWare for mortals supports only Windows and Linux so you choices of a host operating system are quite limited.

    On Windows front your only choice is Windows NT4. Office 97 does everything a normal person needs.

    Any Linux supported by VMWare should do as long as you strip it down a bit and use some lightweight desktop environment. OpenOffice may be a bit too heavy for a slow machine so you may have to use AbiWord and Gnumeric.
  5. Beni Newcomer, in training

    Hmm.. Ok, it doesn't have to be vmware. Something similar is good enough. I saw once a system with BeOS running like this, seemed to work perfectly. But, I'll think about it. I belive, with a good linux, this could work as well.
  6. MYOB Newcomer, in training Posts: 527

    I've run BeOS in 16MB, and run it very well (with Mozilla, etc) in 64MB.

    That said, BeOS gets faster and faster the more RAM you have. But it can handle 32MB.
     
  7. Mictlantecuhtli TS Special Forces Posts: 4,916   +9

    Did I understand this correctly? You want to use VMware in a computer that doesn't have much memory? VMware needs quite a lot of memory, if you're going to run it in a system with 32 MB of memory, you won't have enough left (if anything at all) for VMware.
  8. Beni Newcomer, in training

    no, the computer itself has 768MB Ram. But I have to try a lot of things out (settings on windows, linux). So I want to use a stable "normal" OS, and do the rest on a virtual computer. I know, I could install all the OS directly, but, I think it would be better with a virtual machine. Also the portability, for example from vmware, is more confortable then multi boot.

    So, it would be the best, to have a basic OS which doesn't need to much ram.
  9. Mictlantecuhtli TS Special Forces Posts: 4,916   +9

  10. zephead TechSpot Paladin Posts: 2,483

    i am currently tooling around with red hat linux (ver 7) on a pentium MMX-233 on an old at board with about 81 megs of edo ram. the aged system handles it well even in gui mode. i use kde and the command line mostly, and do compressions and encoding of files on said system. just don't overlook linux's nice networking features.
    also noteworthy: i overclocked the system bus to 75 Mhz, cpu runs at about 265 MHz.
  11. Blakhart Newcomer, in training Posts: 511

    Ever try Qnx?
  12. Nodsu Newcomer, in training Posts: 9,431

    QNX will not run VMWare.

    And the hardware support is poor..
  13. Phantasm66 Newcomer, in training Posts: 6,504

    You can't possibily say alternative OS without saying Linux.
  14. eilathean Newcomer, in training

    Why don't you use VMware ESX instead?

    Therefore your system will be totally virtualized. Besides ESX is greatly more powerful than Destop or GSX.
  15. Charles Hammond Newcomer, in training Posts: 164

    We have an IBM X-Server (Dual PIII) that Has SUSE Linux on it and we run an emulator on that for our IBM Mainframe Software. Runs just like a mainframe.