Wish List: What TechSpot writers want in Windows 10

ITT: people wanting skeuomorphic crap
That makes me utterly sad...
You people need to learn that to move to flatter UIs is NOT a fashion fad, it's the proper use of design principles like ockham's razor and signal-to-noise ratio. From a design perspective, flat UIs are objectively better than skeuomorphic crap. Also, the whole move to flat UIs was started by Microsoft themselves with WP7.
If you actually want fake shadows, fake glass effects, fake textures and similar hideousness, stop complaining about Windows (whicj, jist like OS X, is moving in the right direction) and move to Linux instead.
 
On this link: 4 Simple Reasons Why Windows 9 Will Be A Big Hit Like Windows 7
http://www.intowindows.com/4-simple-reasons-why-windows-9-will-be-like-windows-7/
and here I comment for the items in the link above:

1-Start menu is returning:
Its OK, but users should be able to completely turn off or uninstall any metro UI tiles and its functions, features in the upcoming start menu.
It’s good that you can remove metro apps from the start menu. It would be even better to be able to remove them from the OS though.

Metro UI in Windows 10:

"Metro UI should be optional. I never ever use Metro UI on my computers on windows 8. I never ever use it on my PC (except to add Bluetooth devices, because there is no other way), and not anymore on my Surface Pro, despite it being a tablet. Such a low-density UI is not appropriate for any serious usage, and MS should have let users choose not to install it altogether.

Apart from that, I must say it’s a pretty good OS this Windows 8 : Better frame-rate in games and overall performance, very stable, nice new task manager and file copy dialogs, BitLocker not needing a TPM to run anymore, make it a very good system. But users focus on the Metro UI problem (though they can avoid it altogether), which makes the switch difficult for them.

Releasing different SKUs is the idea they should have gone with from the start (desktop only for mouse-keyboard computers, both UIs for tablets such as the Surface Pro, and Metro only for low-end, cheap ARM tablets).I sure do hope they stick to that idea, because all the Metro/Modern UI takes space on the drive and makes the whole system more complex for nothing, at least for me who don't use it at all.(plus it's super annoying to have metro UI pop, for example, when searching for Bluetooth devices. Why ?)


2-Modern apps can be run just like traditional programs.

Desktop users do not need to have modern apps in Desktop environment. Please consider an option to disable or remove having modernUI apps or Windows Store apps in Desktop environment.

About number 4 in the link above which says Start screen is not coming for desktop users:

Yes the improved Start Screen in Windows 8.1 Update1, offers more features than the Start menu in Windows 7.
Its good to know that in Windows 9, the Start screen will likely appear only if the Windows is installed on a computer that supports touch.

Search function in Start Screen in Windows 8.1 Update1 is indeed great.

Store apps in Start Menu or Desktop:
IMO, app store = USELESS on a PC (there is already the whole internet, why would one want to restrict himself to an app store.....)
The Microsoft store seems to be getting more intrusive too. I don't want a shop, I want an OS!
Metro apps, Metro UI and the app store are completely useless on a production machine, if you intend to do anything serious on it. A single-window, low density user interface is not appropriate for complex tasks such as photo or video editing, development, CGI, etc. It’s only useful for casual users.
It should be an option to disable it altogether if one doesn’t plan to use it, to save disk space.

The notification center:
The notification center which is not available in this technical build, seems like an improvement from the windows 8 version, tidier and more easily accessible. But still, notifications are pretty useless to me. I don’t see them very often since I don’t use social networks, the only ones I receive are when :

·I install a new application that handles a certain type of file, so it prompts me what application to use to open, say, a jpeg image

·I connect a BitLocker-to-go encrypted memory card or USB stick, so I can enter the password. But if I miss the notification, it pops un when I try to access the volume anyway.


So notifications are, again, a bit of Metro UI they try to unite with the desktop environment, despite it being pretty useless to people who actually use the desktop environment. It’s good they improve them, but if it were me, I’d disable them altogether


(just like virtual desktops. I’ve tried them on mac and linux, and wasn’t convinced. Basically alt-tabbing windows is just as convenient, and virtual desktops add another layer of switching which confuses me : instead of switching between windows you can switch between windows OR desktops, for basically the same purpose : displaying a window or another. But I guess that’s a marketing answer to people saying “look, Mac OS has virtual desktops and Windows hasn’t !”)


LAST BUT NOT THE LEAST,
make a full retail boxed version of the OS in release time, not just as a free upgrade for Win 8.1 users. [Windows 9 said to be free (again), this time by a Microsoft official - Neowin](http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-9-said-to-be-free-again-this-time-by-a-microsoft-official)
 
What I want from Windows is a new Kernel and not another "Upgrade" THAT I'd pay for. Not just another 7.x with tweaks and downgrades. If not it ain't worth more than $20, and I feel that's being generous for a company with a user base spanning over half the worlds PC infrastructure. I know Microsoft doesn't have the hardware sales to match Apple, but honestly do they really need that, figure just getting the 500+ million XP users to switch at $20 a pop, makes Apple's hardware sale look like nothing. As for requested features, others have already brought up the majority of the downfalls in W8 that they'd like to see improved which for the most part I do agree with. But its far easier to ignore your users and remove features, this is becoming more and more evident. Vista to 7 no more Dreamscene, 7 to 8 no more Aero and gadgets, the ladder was also removed from 7 due to security threats... Why improve when you can remove!
 
I want it as a free upgrade to Win 8.1 as an apology for releasing 8 in the 1st place but this is not really Win 10, it's more of a Windows 8.2 than anything else.

My Dad installed the update on his computer. After it's installed you can barely tell it's a new operating system. There is a start menu(which you can't see unless you look for it) and there is a new icon on the taskbar for task switching. Windows 8.2 would have been waaaaayyyyyyy more appropriate for the name at this point.

By their own thought processes they should have named Windows 8 Windows 9 because it was so different from the previous version. Yet they do the absurd now between 8.1 and 8.2(10 *cough, cough*) with very minor visual differences.

Certainly nobody will be saying that Windows 10 (*cough, cough*) distinguishes itself from it's failed predecessor in any special way. It simply evolves the monster that was first born two years ago. Making it less scary and creepy than it was at first sight.
 
Last edited:
Pollo Pazzo posted on winsupersite.com/podcasts/windows-weekly-378-notepad-monster

"Notepad is like the only thing in Windows that literally hasn't changed since the first Windows came out! Windows Weekly 378: Notepad Monster | Podcasts content from Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows"

As of 2013, however, Internet Explorer, Notepad and Visual Studio did not have a ribbon.
Make a ribbon for Notepad at least!

Absolutely No! I despise the ribbon. It takes up far too much room at the top of the screen which is not good with landscape monitors. It does not aid productivity as many of the commands are not placed in a logical location. I spend so much time having to help people find commands.

I also hate the fact that users have a limited choice for customisation unlike previous incarnations of Windows programs.
 
What I want from Windows is a new Kernel and not another "Upgrade" THAT I'd pay for. Not just another 7.x with tweaks and downgrades. If not it ain't worth more than $20, and I feel that's being generous for a company with a user base spanning over half the worlds PC infrastructure. I know Microsoft doesn't have the hardware sales to match Apple, but honestly do they really need that, figure just getting the 500+ million XP users to switch at $20 a pop, makes Apple's hardware sale look like nothing. As for requested features, others have already brought up the majority of the downfalls in W8 that they'd like to see improved which for the most part I do agree with. But its far easier to ignore your users and remove features, this is becoming more and more evident. Vista to 7 no more Dreamscene, 7 to 8 no more Aero and gadgets, the ladder was also removed from 7 due to security threats... Why improve when you can remove!
Very good points.

One improvement I would like to see would be reducing the need to reboot Windows when an update is performed. When I tried out Linux I was only asked to reboot the PC on a handful of occasions. In fact it would be nice if changes to settings in IE would be active without having to close the program down.
 
1. Dump the 32-bit of OS altogether (not my idea but good)
I think you mean discontinue the 32 bit version of windows as the 64 bit version does run 32 bit programs

2. Add tabs to the cmd console (not my idea but good)
Not quite sure how useful that is but I am sure there are some qualified folk who can comment.

3. manditoty regisration for all users
name address telephone number where microsoft will send you two codes via snail mail
a reinstall code for when you have problems
and a final code for deactivation so that that cd key code will become obsolete
Why?
4. lock the run command and command line for single computers with a 9 to 64 encrypted digit password
this would prevent rouge software from installing in the background while you do other things
Rouge software makes me see red!

5. prevent all 32 bit software from running except in a sandbox where it has limited access to hardware
Why? I am sure many users of legacy programs will find that unworkable.

6. bring back "A and B drives but only for the operating system "C drive" would still be your main storage drive
Why?
 
Powershell has always had r-mouse click paste support. Why is everyone focusing on command prompt. Its replacement (and much much more) is a far superior tool. I produce magic with Powershell ISE. I like it even more than Linux GREP. Why anyone would even bother with the Windows command prompt anymore is a little beyond my comprehension.
 
I mostly have 2 major requests when it comes to windows 10

1: Start Menu have a bit of customization
2: Bring back the old shortcuts from Windows 7 that were removed from 8

Other than that I personally liked 8 and I already like the looks of 10. The reality is that its more of an updated 8.1 with more robust feature sets and more attention to the user.
 
Pretty simple but I was the free disk space put back in the status bar for the drive you are navigating in. They took this out after Vista I believe and has been gone since 7. Sure I can go install third party application ClassicShell, which is great... but why remove such a simple feature, which wasn't even on by default in the first place?
 
Most people just point out the Start menu issues with Windows 8 but there is actually a few other things that really make me rant as a computer tech.

1. The "PC settings" vs control panel. Half the features is in one and half is in the other.. why?! User management is hell cause you need to jump between the two.

2. The "manage wireless networks" feature from Windows 7 was removed. Now if a user logs into their router and change the pwd on it but leave the ssid alone Windows 8 cannot "forget" and reconnect to the network unless you enter a essay into the command prompt.

3. The backup features require a phd to setup, system restore is off by default, the removal of the F8 menu on startup that just dumps machines into loop boots forever and once again require a LOT of work to repair.
The backup features also refuse to use internal drives, people like me with a SSD and a huge mirror would really like to backup to the large mirror but are not allowed to do so.

4. Dual monitor support is CRAP. Cannot display the time and notification icons on any other display but the primary. Pinned items on second displays don't show proper context menus (like Skype)

Those are just the ones I run into on a near daily basis...

Also finally I totally agree that paying for a new version all the time is wrong, a $50 upgrade would be my high end.
 
Pretty simple but I was the free disk space put back in the status bar for the drive you are navigating in. They took this out after Vista I believe and has been gone since 7. Sure I can go install third party application ClassicShell, which is great... but why remove such a simple feature, which wasn't even on by default in the first place?

You forgot to also add the missing Up button, one of my favorite things to add to my Windows install is ClassicShell for that sole reason. It's also great fun when other W7 users use my system and are like, wtf, you have an Up button??? Was it returned in W8? I don't even know.
 
It would be more like a cloud in the middle of a sunny day, it's a perfect day unless you keep on focusing on that ONE cloud passing over your head.
With all those colored squares and without Aero those clouds are far greater in numbers than you might think. I don't even see blue skies, they are so distracting. I hate abstract desktop images, and I don't need the **** in my window frames or menus.
 
I'd like to see a return of the Calendar in Windows 10 (Windows 7 has it). I'd also like to see the inclusion of Media Center, which was also in Windows 7 (Microsoft made it an optional upgrade in Win8).
 
Everything in Windows that has a comparable third party substitute, should be an optional install. Then put a price on the optional installs if not free, to lower the price of the main OS shell. But no, MS wants a reason to keep prices high. And Microsoft knows if they split their OS package, some of their software would die.
 
Free updates for more than 5 years, easily customize-able, backwards compatible with everything in W7, hell, even win xp. Speedy non cluster quality. Mouse and keyboard focus (Not touch) Desktop focus (not tablet) Make it free or cheap (-$30) I can see it at $200 which is ridiculous bs. A supported "app" store of programs that auto update and are virus free scanned and looked over by windows themselves, however, still allow third party installations........that's all I can think of right now
 
Absolutely No! I despise the ribbon. It takes up far too much room at the top of the screen which is not good with landscape monitors. It does not aid productivity as many of the commands are not placed in a logical location. I spend so much time having to help people find commands.

I also hate the fact that users have a limited choice for customisation unlike previous incarnations of Windows programs.

Can't you minimize the ribbon?
Both Paint and WordPad have ribbon.It makes commands larger and easier to find.It will make many more features visibly discoverable.

"If Microsoft goes through with this change, the Ribbon will replace the menu and toolbar in today's Explorer windows, and as in Office, it will make many more features visibly discoverable, albeit at the expense of onscreen real estate and, we think, attractiveness."
http://withinwindows.com/blog/2011/04/02/windows-8-secrets-windows-explorer-ribbon
 
With all those colored squares and without Aero those clouds are far greater in numbers than you might think. I don't even see blue skies, they are so distracting. I hate abstract desktop images, and I don't need the **** in my window frames or menus.

I rest my point.

You probably were one of those players that focused on the tank first, am I right? =P
 
I rest my point.

You probably were one of those players that focused on the tank first, am I right? =P
If one cloud is objectionable, why do you think one tank will be a better comparison? I've already stated it is not as simple as not looking, unless you want us to keep our monitors turned off. Because that is the only way I wouldn't notice.
 
If one cloud is objectionable, why do you think one tank will be a better comparison? I've already stated it is not as simple as not looking, unless you want us to keep our monitors turned off. Because that is the only way I wouldn't notice.

Because you are focusing on ONE part of the whole scheme, and you make it a huge problem when it's not.

You can't see the rest of the picture just a colored square you don't even need to use. But then again...
 
Nothing is full HTML5 ready as the HTML5 schema isn't even finalized, keeps being revised. Firefox (last time I checked when I was doing some prototyping with HTML5 local storage and canvas) I think is the one with the most HTML5 features supported. Would be nice if browsers could at least support the majority of features that are finalized though :(
 
Back