Phantasm66 said:64 ?>!?!??!!?
Did it even install?
... 64MB does not cut it in today's applications.
what is onghorn anywayAyasha said:I really have to echo that statement.. wow.. you actually got that OS to install with only 64MB of Ram. But I'll say that for 2000 that 256MB of Ram is the minimum you should have, though it will run with 128. I personally do not believe that the system performance can be considered decent with less than 256MB of ram in it for a system running W2K. For XP double to 512 as a min.
Anyone want to start a pool at how much RAM we will actually need to run longhorn? 4GB? 8GB?
-A-
Ayasha said:I really have to echo that statement.. wow.. you actually got that OS to install with only 64MB of Ram. But I'll say that for 2000 that 256MB of Ram is the minimum you should have, though it will run with 128. I personally do not believe that the system performance can be considered decent with less than 256MB of ram in it for a system running W2K. For XP double to 512 as a min.
Anyone want to start a pool at how much RAM we will actually need to run longhorn? 4GB? 8GB?
-A-