TechSpot Poll

User Comments: 4

1. February 5, 2004 2:17 PM
   ---agissi--- said:
   Will anyone clarify what the difference is between Athlon64 and Athlon64 FX? I think AMD have come a long way and they will keep on going, and going, and going [just like that bunny]. I think prescott will set new standards as far as clock speeds go, but I think AMD has the potential.I'll say Athlon64 [SIZE=1][since I havnt seen the FX name tag around much.][/SIZE]
   Reply
2. February 5, 2004 3:28 PM
   Per Hansson said:
   FX is Opteron/Server high-end workstation modelAthlon 64 is mid/low end workstationMy vote is on no clue, I'll buy whatever has best Value for Money... (if I upgrade at all, my Barton 2500+ is chugging along very nicley)
   Reply
3. February 5, 2004 4:00 PM
   Nic said:
   I voted Athlon64, because Athlon64 FX is too expensive for mainstream, despite being the superior chip. We all want good performance at value for money prices, so this ones a no brainer for me.
   Reply
4. February 5, 2004 6:29 PM
   Masque said:
   [quote][i]Originally posted by Nic [/i]I voted Athlon64, because Athlon64 FX is too expensive for mainstream, despite being the superior chip. We all want good performance at value for money prices, so this ones a no brainer for me. [/quote] ...AND it's going to be in my next box.....hopefully within the next couple weeks. :grinthumb
   Reply

Recently commented stories