Intel debuts Pentium 4 EE 3.46GHz, disappoints

By on November 1, 2004, 3:20 AM
This morning Intel unveiled the new Pentium 4 Extreme Edition running at 3.46GHz, and although the chip only runs 66MHz faster than its predecessor, coupled with the also new 925XE chipset, the processor gets a pumped front side bus to achieve an impressive 1066MHz, that is, 533MHz dual-channel DDR2 memory.

Intel hopes that this new combination pulls the trick in order to compete with fast and furious Athlon FX offerings, but does it really make a good job at it? After all, the Extreme Edition processor alone will set you back at $999. As for reference sake, this new release is not based on newer Prescott technology but shares much of the same used in Xeon processors, the code-named 'Gallatin' core which carries a generous 2MB of L3 cache.

Unfortunately for Intel, despite of the fact we are already used to small marginal gains with new CPU releases, the 3.46GHz EE processor disappoints in more than a way. For once, it merely performs faster than the 800MHz FSB powered 3.4GHz P4 EE, even worse, the much cheaper Pentium 4 560 (3.6GHz) puts it to shame in several benchmarks and finally, competition's Athlon FX 55 remains at the top as the fastest x86 processor money can buy.

Consider this a technology release then. Don't believe the faster 1066MHz FSB won't bring much to the table because it will, eventually. We will just have to wait until Prescotts or even dual-core CPUs make it to the market when increased bandwidth will come handy.

Full featured reviews are available: Anandtech, TechReport, Hexus, Khardware, Hardocp.

User Comments: 1

Got something to say? Post a comment
Didou said:
The presence of such a large L3 cache kinda defeats the purpose of having a faster FSB. Sucn an FSB increase would certainly have better effects on regular Pentium 4s but the fact that Intel have decided to keep this FSB speed bump only for the rare & overpriced P4EE might mean that they have very bad yields with an FSB over 800mhz.The next Pentium 4 (based off a newer core, not the Prescott) is supposed to have 2MB of L2 cache but the same 800mhz FSB currently available. Another sign Intel is having troubles getting that FSB faster.
Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.