Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
Intel Core i5-based MacBook Pros coming soon?
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
Nice Subtle Windows Logo Wallpaper by Julio | 06-07-08_0819 by blackhawke |
Call of Duty: world at war by detoam | Google Maps fail by mattfrompa |
Industry News
Sony may have settlement for CD lawsuit
More news on the Sony lawsuit settlement. Sony has agreed to a settlement in a nationwide class-action lawsuit about the security flaws introduced by its controversial copy-protection software, according to court documents released earlier this week.
Lawsuits from consumers begun to fly in mid November after it was revealed that Sony had been installed copy protection software on some of its music CDs which could leave a purchaser's PC vulnerable to security attacks.
Earlier, the class-action lawsuits from around the U.S. were consolidated into a single case. The proposed settlement would entitle customers who bought, received or used a Sony CD loaded with XCP to exchange the disk for a replacement CD, an MP3 download of the same album and either a cash payment of US$7.50 and one free album download or three free album downloads. Customers who were affected by MediaMax 5.0 will receive a free MP3 download of the same album and one additional free album download.
Lawsuits from consumers begun to fly in mid November after it was revealed that Sony had been installed copy protection software on some of its music CDs which could leave a purchaser's PC vulnerable to security attacks.
Earlier, the class-action lawsuits from around the U.S. were consolidated into a single case. The proposed settlement would entitle customers who bought, received or used a Sony CD loaded with XCP to exchange the disk for a replacement CD, an MP3 download of the same album and either a cash payment of US$7.50 and one free album download or three free album downloads. Customers who were affected by MediaMax 5.0 will receive a free MP3 download of the same album and one additional free album download.
Related Stories
User Comments (21)
Post a comment| nathanskywalker on January 2, 2006 7:25 PM | So they aren't going to be stupid anymore? Well, good for
them. Course you can hardly blame them for trying to stop
pirating, but hiding software, i'm sorry that was just to
far.
|
| cyrax on January 2, 2006 8:28 PM | I just think this is such a big relief. Think of what they
would have put in Playstation 3 dvds? While the sections are
separate, they could have decided to put it in with no one's
knowledge.
|
| PUTALE on January 2, 2006 10:22 PM | mmh, I think they should also give extra money to those got
effected. It's so unfortunate that we, the cumsomer, has to
suffer from the flaws that the comapnies makes.
|
| anas_t on January 3, 2006 12:14 AM | Yea , I would have sued them If I knew about it ! :)
|
| Craftos on January 3, 2006 1:50 AM | Well, it was logical choice, cause court case would only end
worse. Either way - lawyers win :\
|
| Rage_3K_Moiz on January 3, 2006 2:27 AM | Sony seems to have hit a spot of turbulence. But I think
they will be able to recover all of their losses when the
PS3 debuts i.e. if they follow PUTALE's advice and
monetarily compensate those affected.
|
| MonkeyMan on January 3, 2006 2:36 AM | I agree Rage, the PS3 will more than make up for their
losses, regarding this legal dispute. At least Sony realized
they were wrong, and decided to cooperate, and correct their
error, by providing free albums. Nice work Sony, its great
to see a company that realizes their mistakes, and correct
them in a respectable, and professional way.
|
| PanicX on January 3, 2006 3:08 AM | I'm not overly well versed in the aspects of corporate
identities, however I do believe that because Sony BMG is a
subdivision of Sony Global, its overall success or failure
doesn't impact the other divisions of Sony. Basically, the
Sony divisions are more like individual companies, with
their own Stock and Executive boards that are only
responsible to their own entities. When BMG gets sued as
they recently were, the only assets available for damage
compensation are those in Sony BMG and not Sony Global.
So what I'm trying to say is that Sony's Playstation 3 won't have any impact on Sony BMG, not that the lawsuit or bad PR are going to affect BMG much either.
|
| rahuls on January 3, 2006 5:07 AM | Sony should add up some more spice to compensation offered
looking at the insecurity caused to the customers who had
trusted it.
|
| mentaljedi on January 3, 2006 6:57 AM | At least Sony did something about it unlike some companies
with faulty xbox 360s...
|
| asphix on January 3, 2006 7:20 AM | While I always hate to see lawsuits thrown around, Sony had
this one coming and it shows that we still have rights as
consumers that are acknowledged by the legal system and the
corporations (even if heasitantly). We're starting to see some lines being drawn on the extent these companies can go. I guess sueing minors wasnt far enough already.
|
| enasni on January 3, 2006 7:57 AM | I think that the settlement they cmae up with is complete
idiocracy. Same download from them of the same
album? Sounds a bit fishy to me seeing as how there responsible for the whole problem. But the download and what $7.50 is supposed to make up for your wrecked computer? I think they should have to pay technicians to go out to everyones homes and fix these computer problems.
|
| Bartzy on January 3, 2006 9:34 AM | So consumers wasted their time and money, sued Sony, and
they are getting a free album that costs 7.50$ ? Woohoo. I
think Sony is insolent. If consumers where exposed to
security attacks because of Sony, it's not right. They
should pay much more than a 7.50$ album (that probably costs
them 3$ or so).
|
| mastronaut on January 3, 2006 10:26 AM | In my opinion, these companies created their own problems by
signing 'one hit wonders'. There's nothing worse than paying
$12-15 bucks for a disk with one or two good tracks on it! I
can see why people download it first. If it's good most
people will buy the CD. We all know the quality is much
better than mp3. Just give us our hard earned moneys worth.
(ok SONY)? (enter other labels here).
|
| asphix on January 3, 2006 11:04 AM | Enasni, Bartzy, while I strongly agree that what the
consumer effected by this issue is receiving in indemnities
are lacking there really is a positive to be seen from this
situation regardless. Just the fact that a very solid line has been drawn and Sony BMG is being forced to take action, period, is a huge step. We have just gone from the company suing 12 year olds to the company admitting a foul and offering indemnities (however pitiful). Baby steps.. Admitting you are falable is the first step.. its all down hill from here. Its important to acknowledge and focus on the positive so further progress can be squeezed out of future similar situations. [Edited by asphix on 2006-01-03 11:08:10]
|
| Rhianntp on January 3, 2006 11:39 AM | Originally posted by mastronaut: In my
opinion, these companies created their own problems by
signing 'one hit wonders'. There's nothing worse than paying
$12-15 bucks for a disk with one or two good tracks on it! I
can see why people download it first. If it's good most
people will buy the CD. We all know the quality is much
better than mp3. Just give us our hard earned moneys worth.
(ok SONY)? (enter other labels here). I agree fully.
In the last 20 years rarely has anything been releeased
thats worth $15. Dont get me wrong, there are alot of very
talented artists who put out awesome work..we just dont get
to hear or see it promoted..
|
| mastronaut on January 3, 2006 1:24 PM | I agree, where are the Pink Floyds, Led Zeps and
Kansas(es)? Bands that you could count on for an albums worth of good music. Carrey Underwood is touring, she has one song out! How can she possibly fill one and a half to two hours time in concert? Ridiculous...
|
| enasni on January 3, 2006 2:06 PM | asphix You do make a great point but consumers already know
that everyone is falable and if you think its better that it
is public knowledge then think about this. A company that large making a mistake like that can only mean that they are close to bankrupcty and will be bought out by another company in the near future. They have become so relaxed in there ways that they are beginning to become bored and find new means of entertainment. They clearly knew it was illegal and would cause massive problems but they wanted the attention to bring there name back stronger into the public.
|
| kwr_rc on January 3, 2006 4:03 PM | Their sales are down due to poor respect to their customers.
Who wants to buy CDs from people who are treating you like
a criminal? Not me. If they want respect (and sales back
to normal or above) they have to earn it first. I don't see one sign of them wanting to change their business practices, why should I?
|
| PanicX on January 3, 2006 6:20 PM | S
ony 's Revitalization Howard Stringer (Sony CEO) has had huge plans for recreating Sony since Sept 05. Of course things like massive layoffs and closing manufactoring facilities take some time. But word is that Sony may be selling off their non-core assests to focus more on their core business (consumer eletronics).
|
| flavin on January 3, 2006 10:49 PM | Didn't SONY also get in trouble with their PS2 DUALSHOCK2
Contorllers?
|
TechSpot RSS



