Home › News › Industry News
Microsoft up in the air over Hotmail
"Removing one of those ad products is a very costly thing," product planner Richard Sim told his colleagues during a meeting about the ad issue, among others. But in the end, everyone knew what had to be done. Painful as it was, they had to side with their users and hope the dollars would be there.
For now, it will remain largely unchanged. But a year from now? It seems competing with g-mail isn't as easy as they thought.
Related Stories
User Comments (5)
Post a comment|
DragonMaster
on April 26, 2006 8:46 PM |
[quote]Hotmail isn't so hot, it seems, [/quote]I stopped to use Hotmail (~2002) when they got up the new interface. I was getting bored by that crappy webmail.Whay I changED :1- SPAM2- SPAM3- They removed POP mail4- Lots of ads5- LOTS of ads6- Mailbox was 3MB7- ONLY 3MB (Before a lot more)8- It's Microsoft9- The new interface was SLLLLOOOOOOOOWWWW! (Loading time)10- Small attachmentsThen I got Netscape Mail. 100-200MBs free, but I switched when I stopped using Netscape 7, which was getting obsolete. (IMAP worked only with Netscape, not Mozilla or anything else)Then I got Softhome. The UI was crap, I never really switched. They removed POP mail last year.Now I have Yahoo. No problems (Apart for the cheesy translation), there's POP, 2GB of space, SMTP server, fast interface on dialup, not much SPAM, I can send mails to Hotmail accounts (Not liek Netscape).More recently I got a GMail account. Is pretty cool, but as long as my IM doesn't notify me of every incoming mails, I won't change. I should start using it for personal mail. |
|
Julio
on April 27, 2006 1:35 AM |
I'm no Hotmail lover either. Even with their new Beta Live interface, it feels sluggish compared to other free providers such as Google and Yahoo. The only reason I keep my account is for Messenger (which is also really bad, but many of my friends use it). |
|
fiziks
on April 27, 2006 8:52 AM |
well it IS beta, plus they're probably just throwing the NAME "hotmail" around, they're going to keep the service. I mean, they've spent so much time now it seems creating the LIVE service, they'll probably just change the name to LIVE mail or something |
|
GeoK
on April 30, 2006 5:31 PM |
Basically, I just use Hotmail as a conduit for my Microsoft programs. It works excellent in that capacity - even for reading my e-mail. I cannot say the same for their 'Live' however. It is sluggish to me as well as being a genuine pain-in-the-... when you try to read ANY e-mails. Make sure you have new batteries in your mouse and nimble up your index finger if you want to read your e-mails. Other than that it may yet possibly produce a site more then what they have. Hence, I went back to using Hotmail. A lot less nerve racking! |
|
tokyopete
on May 1, 2006 2:26 AM |
Hotmail is fine when used with Outlook Express. I can even download my gmail into outlook express or send mail form OE from my gmail account. One can keep everything in local folders and if the OS (dear old windows) goes bellyup then it is usually possible to retrieve the local folder emails from identities- MS - outlook express.Other than that, what more does one need from hotmail? Firefox runs fine. I can access hotmail on the server via Firefox if needed.I never take any notice of ads, if there are any and wouldn't follow up in the first place especially if it is coming from M$.LOL everybody. |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' Tablet Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.