Home › News › Industry News
Senator proposes fines for non-relevant search results
Despite of the bad connotation usually seen with companies that base its business on advertising, many of them can survive public critisism and actually enjoy of a good reputation – such as Google. That said, it's a bit shocking to hear of a Senator from South Carolina propose that search engines returning links based on advertising partners rather than content relevance have severe penalties applied to them – including monetary fines in the millions of dollars and even jailtime for the CEOs behind the companies! The article brings up a good point:
The three most popular search engines, Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN are principally advertising resellers. So the more pages bearing their advertisements they return, the more likely they are to prosper. It's a commercial conflict of interest that none of the big three have yet to address, let alone resolve.
And yet, companies like Google and Yahoo claim to be entirely about relevance, not about advertisement. Definitely an interesting conundrum.
The three most popular search engines, Google, Yahoo! and Microsoft's MSN are principally advertising resellers. So the more pages bearing their advertisements they return, the more likely they are to prosper. It's a commercial conflict of interest that none of the big three have yet to address, let alone resolve.
And yet, companies like Google and Yahoo claim to be entirely about relevance, not about advertisement. Definitely an interesting conundrum.
Related Stories
User Comments (5)
Post a comment|
canadian
on June 23, 2006 4:53 PM |
Why is the U.S. government so against the internet, and the good parts about it?!?!?!? |
|
nathanskywalker
on June 23, 2006 7:23 PM |
[quote]Who could object to such a proposal?[/quote] Oh, definently not me, of course not, this is one of the greatest ideas of all time! Really, people just get dumber and dumber. Ok, so the idea has some merit, mabye it could clean up your search results a little bit, you know what, if you want that use the advanced features, or learn the algorithm, how it works well enough to know how to really use it. WE DO NOT NEED THE GOVERNMENTS "HELP". LEAVE GOOGLE ALONE! |
|
DragonMaster
on June 23, 2006 11:56 PM |
[quote]And yet, companies like Google and Yahoo claim to be entirely about relevance, not about advertisement. Definitely an interesting conundrum.[/quote]Maybe true, what if their robots fell on sites like this? |
|
Julio
on June 23, 2006 11:59 PM |
This might have some sense in the days that Altavista and other big search players started accepting money for higher placements in search results... but nowadays this is hardly the case, so I don't see much room for this ruling to work. |
|
ContentWorth
on June 26, 2006 8:41 AM |
The senator makes a good point. Why wouldn't search engines support the results which lead to more money? Perhaps the US government should also have a regulation against passing laws and bills which gain them more money as opposed to holding any relevance to the needs and desires of the whole. "So the more pages bearing their advertisements they return, the more likely they are to prosper. It's a commercial conflict of interest..."And who better to recognize this type of situation than a senator? |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
Editors' Storage Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.