Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
China closes major hacker ring, arrests three members
Sharp and Samsung end LCD patent suits with cross-licensing agreement
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
My Gaming Rig by Moltar | New NASA Photo = New Desktop Pic by luvhuffer |
Techmax v1 / pic 3 by cookieboy | HAWAIIAN RAINBOW by earthlostangel |
Industry News
Microsoft sued over Office Live
Right after Microsoft is hit with a $1.5 Billion fine over copyright infringement (though they are fighting back), they've been sued yet again, this time over Office. In particular, the “Office Live” name, which Microsoft is using to push their various “Live” products, is shared by another company. The company runs various professional advice websites, which has little or nothing to do with Office software. They've owned the name Office Live for five years. Initially, they were in talks with Microsoft. Obviously those have failed and now they are heading for the courts:
"It is shocking that Microsoft would have so little regard for another company's intellectual property rights that it would select a name belonging to another company," Lenny Targon, Office Live chief executive, said in a statement. "Online software may be the next big thing, but Microsoft has no right to use our trademark without permission."
Microsoft hasn't issued a statement yet. Does the small company have a point? If you search for Office Live on Google, the first two full pages are related directly to MS. The other company doesn't show up until the very last entry on the second page. I sure wouldn't want to share a name with MS, either.
"It is shocking that Microsoft would have so little regard for another company's intellectual property rights that it would select a name belonging to another company," Lenny Targon, Office Live chief executive, said in a statement. "Online software may be the next big thing, but Microsoft has no right to use our trademark without permission."
Microsoft hasn't issued a statement yet. Does the small company have a point? If you search for Office Live on Google, the first two full pages are related directly to MS. The other company doesn't show up until the very last entry on the second page. I sure wouldn't want to share a name with MS, either.
Related Stories
TechSpot RSS



