Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
China closes major hacker ring, arrests three members
Intel Core i5-based MacBook Pros coming soon?
Sharp and Samsung end LCD patent suits with cross-licensing agreement
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
 cool linux by mk_once |  iPhone 3G S sample #2 by Rick |
 5970. by Tehoste |  My 2 PC by filimarcus |
TechSpot RSSIndustry News
Blu-ray profile 2.0 arrives, early adopters get nothing
How do you reward your customers for helping you get and keep the number one spot in HD media? Render their hardware obsolete, of course. At least, that's the plan if you are the Blu-ray Disc Association, which has the foresight to continue adapting Blu-ray technology to make newer discs unplayable in older players, thus forcing people to buy new players.
With the introduction of BD Profile 2.0, key features are added that make the units more robust. Features like local storage, network connectivity, et cetera – all very good things to have, but things that were initially left out due to cost, so they say. The hardware refresh addresses the issues, but the caveat is that newer media, depending on how it is configured, won't be playable.
Note: This story has been edited for accuracy. Originally we mistakenly quoted Blu-ray Disc Association's spokesman Andy Parsons. His actual take on the matter was a more apologetic 'technology changes, eventually becomes obsolete.' If there is anything further to report on the matter we will follow-up with a new story.
With the introduction of BD Profile 2.0, key features are added that make the units more robust. Features like local storage, network connectivity, et cetera – all very good things to have, but things that were initially left out due to cost, so they say. The hardware refresh addresses the issues, but the caveat is that newer media, depending on how it is configured, won't be playable.
Note: This story has been edited for accuracy. Originally we mistakenly quoted Blu-ray Disc Association's spokesman Andy Parsons. His actual take on the matter was a more apologetic 'technology changes, eventually becomes obsolete.' If there is anything further to report on the matter we will follow-up with a new story.
Related Stories
User Comments (7)
Post a comment| AParsons on January 14, 2008 1:26 PM | Hi Justin: I must protest your inaccurate quote that I "responded with a cold 'they knew what they were getting into'". I said no such thing. If you attended the press event, you will recall that when asked about this, I responded that it's the nature of electronics technology for new features and capabilities to be added over time, a fact that I believe early adopters understand all too well. I also said that early generation Blu-ray players will continue to deliver what most people bought them for: playback of high definition video and audio content. By the way, I am only the chair of the U.S. promotion committee for the BDA, not the president. That job is held by someone else. -- Andy Parsons
|
| Nirkon on January 14, 2008 1:27 PM | I say screw bluray just for that, go for HDDVD
|
| shl0791 on January 14, 2008 2:35 PM | They can't even modify the players' firmware? Well then,
screw them. HD DVD FTW!
|
| canadian on January 15, 2008 12:02 AM | I must say this is disappointing, but this leads me to
question: Can the PS3 play the new disks? If it can, then
why cant other players?
|
| Julio on January 15, 2008 12:38 AM | I don't believe this will affect current blu-ray players in
the short term, who knows how things will adapt in the
longer run. That said, I'm a bit impressed by the U.S.
figures released out there: same market share in terms of
standalone players (hd dvd vs. blu-ray), the PS3 contributes
massively to dominate the total amount of capable players
out there. Finally there is a larger number of blu-ray
movies being sold and rented, however the quality among the
few hundred movies out there is about the same. The result
is a non-sense fight for the end consumer. Wait, wasn't that
obvious?
|
| Eddie_42 on January 15, 2008 9:07 AM | Read the first comment and the amended note. They are just
adding bells and whistles left off initially to cut down
cost. The functionality of the playback will be unaffected.
|
| zeda.Zakuya on January 21, 2008 3:15 PM | just another way to bring blu-ray down and i must say this
article is so wrong.why because when older blu-ray player
cant use the new profile 2.0 that does not mean they can't
play blu-ray . blu-ray discs can always be played on a
blu-ray player.playstation 3 is the only blu-ray player that
can get every firmware upgrade and make total use of it .i
still say blu-ray is the better player because it's not on
the dying species list.that's why they have so much more
company backing and studio backing.hey don't get it wrong
here i love hd-dvd judt like the rest but don't make
articles that are total nonsense
|
Featured Tech Content - Inside TechSpot
 ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review |  ATI Radeon HD 5450 Review |  TechSpot PC Buying Guide |  Effortless Ways to Download Video Content from YouTube and Other Sites |  ATI Radeon HD 5670 Review |