Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
Intel's six-core Gulftown processor benchmarked months early
Microsoft issues warning for IE6, IE7 security hole
Samsung intros 2TB, eSATA-packing Story Station Plus external HDD
Gigabyte adds USB 3.0, 6Gbps SATA to AMD boards
AdMob: iPhone accounts for 50% of global mobile traffic
TechSpot RSSInformation Technology
Comcast pays people to fill seats at FCC hearing
The FCC, prompted by complaints about Comcast possibly blocking access to file-sharing in order to better manage its network load, held a hearing on Monday to determine if the practice is “reasonable”. But just how big are the stakes in this so-called network neutrality debate? Apparently, big enough for the cable operator to actually pay people off the street to attend early and effectively keep some of its opponents out of the room.
A Comcast representative acknowledged that they indeed paid some individuals to attend, though she denied that the company was attempting to keep out the public, stating that they were only waiting in line for Comcast employees who had been encouraged to attend. Some of those placeholders, however, did more than wait in line: they filled many of the seats at the meeting and actually slept through the proceedings. Clearly, Comcast will resort to just about any tactic to stack the decks in its favor.
A Comcast representative acknowledged that they indeed paid some individuals to attend, though she denied that the company was attempting to keep out the public, stating that they were only waiting in line for Comcast employees who had been encouraged to attend. Some of those placeholders, however, did more than wait in line: they filled many of the seats at the meeting and actually slept through the proceedings. Clearly, Comcast will resort to just about any tactic to stack the decks in its favor.
Related Stories
User Comments (5)
Post a comment| windmill007 on February 27, 2008 9:04 AM | I hope comcast pays dearly and shows the ISP's that they
can't restrict internet access. You restrict one thing you
will open a can of worms. If your network can't handle the
load either upgrade your equipment or as much as I hate
start metered access. I myself would never use metered and
I'm sure they would lose alot of customers. You restrict or
start metering now someone will just come along with free
open access and put you under. Net Neutrality FTW
|
| icye on February 27, 2008 10:53 AM | The best way is to have customers cancel their Comcast
accounts, then the company will lose money and understand
not to screw with customers in such ways. Throttling speeds
is stupid because there are many legal uses for torrents
such as new Linux versions, game demos, basically any file
that is too large and would take too long to download.
|
| howzz1854 on February 27, 2008 1:00 PM | WTF, i hope FCC is reading this.... this is ridiculously
bananas!
|
| siiix on March 1, 2008 5:09 AM | its stupid anyhow to "block access to file-sharing" what
they think protocols would not be updates? in the end the
endusers internet would barely work do to all the
restrictions this is not the way to fight illegal downloads besides thats not what they want to do anyhow, they just try to be cheap maybe rater they should do it with (flat rate) mobile broadband = till certain gig its full speed, if you above they contention speed is reduced till end of that month
|
| Deathstar17 on March 1, 2008 12:00 PM | Now this is why I will never use Comcast...
|
