Google axed multi-touch support at Apple's request?

By on February 10, 2009, 3:21 PM
Ever wonder why the Android-powered T-Mobile G1 doesn't support multi touch gestures such as pinching? The platform can clearly support it, as it has been demonstrated by third party developers, so perhaps the decision not to include multi touch was a political one rather than technological. At least according to VentureBeat which, citing an unnamed Android team member, claims Apple asked for the little favor.


If true, then it would confirm what we've been hearing from Apple lately: the company is ready to protect the technology behind the iPhone and has even hinted at legal action against Palm for using multi touch technology on its new Pre smartphone. The idea of a company crippling its own product just to keep Apple happy seems odd, to say the least, but Google could have much to gain by staying on Apple's good side.

The iPhone comes out of the box with Google Maps installed, Google's search engine built into the mobile version of Safari, a YouTube client and of course there is the fact that Google CEO Eric Schmidt has a seat on the board at Apple. Perhaps they were willing to sacrifice multi touch, but keep a powerful partner happy. Eventually, however, multi-touch might become important enough that Google has to include it in future phones running Android. Time will tell.




User Comments: 4

Got something to say? Post a comment
iSteven said:
Someone smart will Hack into the Android(Not Me..lol), then what will Apple do?
windmill007 said:
Apple needs to get over itself. When people finally open there eyes and realize how apple is a very closed sourced company which overcharges for all there products and move on to cheaper more open products.... Apple won't be so smug. I just hope people realize before its to late.
tengeta said:
Its funny that Microsoft Jr. gets away with this when Sr. would be getting sued in court.
MichaelLS said:
"claims Apple asked for the little favor"Have you read the patent?Google can't include this feature in the product. Not without paying royalties and of course - Little Micro$oft Junior says - 'No!' It's all mine! Go away!This will only end in the courtrooms. They will sue each other until a totally un-fair agreement is reached to share / compete with the technology un-fairly. Is that completely un-clear?History repeats itself!
Load all comments...

Add New Comment

TechSpot Members
Login or sign up for free,
it takes about 30 seconds.
You may also...
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.