also @ TechSpot: Microsoft launches YouTube app, Google demands it taken down

Apple ordered to pay $19M for willful patent infringement

By

On April 25, 2009, 4:57 PM

Filing a lawsuit against Apple in 2007, Opti Inc. accused the Cupertino-based company of willful infringement on a “predictive snooping” patent. The patent in question outlines a method of more efficiently delivering data among the CPU, memory and other devices. Acknowledging that a similar technology had been employed, Apple argued that the patent should be declared invalid due to prior art and also cited a Supreme Court ruling whereby obvious patents can be overturned should they fail a test of “obviousness”.

Unfortunately for Apple, the jury rejected their argument and found the company guilty of willful patent infringement, awarding Opti $19,009,728 as a reasonable royalty for infringement. While this is hardly a fatal blow in Apple’s pocket, having just reported their strongest non-holiday quarter in the company’s history, one must wonder why they’re so heavily targeted for patent infringement.

No tags on this story

User Comments: 5

Got something to say? Post a comment
  1. Not so fun when the finger is pointed at you, eh Apple? Alas, it's just pocket change I'm sure.
  2. "one must wonder why they’re so heavily targeted for patent infringement"Ummm ... let's see.Because they are puffed-up self-important primadonnas who are usually on the other end of the lawsuit gun?
  3. So sad . . . too bad huh Apple!
  4. "... one must wonder why they’re so heavily targeted for patent infringement."Two reasons; They're a company trying to be profitable so they're inclined to believe their lawyers when told they don't need to pay for something ("Hey, we can do this for free? Let's do it!"), and BECAUSE they ARE making a profit, they're a natural target (the number of patent infringement lawsuits are often proportional to a company's profits: i.e., Microsoft).
  5. While those could be the reasons, you do have to understand that some patents are for, well, obvious technology. It is a shame that patents reside on certain things, which just bottlenecks technology development.

Recently commented stories

Post a new comment

Social Login & Guest Posting TechSpot Members
Login here or sign up for free,
it takes about a minute.
Get complete access to the TechSpot community. Join thousands of technology enthusiasts that contribute and share knowledge in our forum. Get a private inbox, upload your own photo gallery and more.
TechSpot on:

Subscribe to TechSpot

Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.