Home › News › Microsoft
Microsoft sets maximum specs for Windows 7 netbooks
Microsoft has already demonstrated how Windows 7 is lightweight enough to run on netbooks, but apparently the company has some limitations planned for the operating system that could hinder its adoption on these machines – or even worse, discourage manufacturers from selling well-equipped netbooks. According to TechARP, a site that has accurately revealed the company’s moves in the past, Microsoft has set new maximum specifications for netbooks allowed to carry its entry-level (and hence cheapest) Windows 7 versions.
Specifically, these devices will need to feature screens no larger than 10.2 inches and run on a single-core processor no faster than 2GHz with a thermal design power that is less than or equal to 15 watts, not including the graphics and chipset. RAM is capped at 1GB like before, though storage is bumped to 250GB HDD or 64GB SSD and there's no limitation on graphics or touch capabilities.
It appears that as the line dividing netbooks and entry-level notebooks continues to blur, Microsoft is trying to make a clear distinction between the two based on screen size and performance. This is meant to protect their margins, seeing as how computer makers pay about $15 for an XP license for a netbook, but around $45 or more for a copy of Windows on a full-fledged computer.
There’s something disconcerting about a software maker putting rules on hardware and trying to determine the direction of computing for years to come – even for a company as large and influential as Microsoft. Intel, for example, has already announced a new Atom processor designed to power the next generation of netbooks, which will integrate a memory controller and graphics core onto the processor itself. But with a 15 watt TDP limit, this next generation of netbooks will probably have to skip Windows 7 altogether.
Nothing has been made official yet, so Microsoft could just deny the alleged limitations or at least reconsider them as the hardware market moves forward. We’ll have to wait and see.
Specifically, these devices will need to feature screens no larger than 10.2 inches and run on a single-core processor no faster than 2GHz with a thermal design power that is less than or equal to 15 watts, not including the graphics and chipset. RAM is capped at 1GB like before, though storage is bumped to 250GB HDD or 64GB SSD and there's no limitation on graphics or touch capabilities.
It appears that as the line dividing netbooks and entry-level notebooks continues to blur, Microsoft is trying to make a clear distinction between the two based on screen size and performance. This is meant to protect their margins, seeing as how computer makers pay about $15 for an XP license for a netbook, but around $45 or more for a copy of Windows on a full-fledged computer.
There’s something disconcerting about a software maker putting rules on hardware and trying to determine the direction of computing for years to come – even for a company as large and influential as Microsoft. Intel, for example, has already announced a new Atom processor designed to power the next generation of netbooks, which will integrate a memory controller and graphics core onto the processor itself. But with a 15 watt TDP limit, this next generation of netbooks will probably have to skip Windows 7 altogether.
Nothing has been made official yet, so Microsoft could just deny the alleged limitations or at least reconsider them as the hardware market moves forward. We’ll have to wait and see.
Related Stories
User Comments (4)
Post a comment|
Deathstar17
on May 25, 2009 2:06 PM |
Is Microsoft trying to fail? Sometimes I wonder... |
|
yukka
on May 25, 2009 2:33 PM |
hmm I don't see this as a massive issue but people would always argue with one of the restrictions.The lowering of the screen from 12inch to 10 inch is a bit rubbish.Now they can use Directx10 and later versions but XP couldnt use DirectX10 anyway so thats not really a big change although it is written to look like one.End of the day, MS don't want to give away copies of their new operating system for cheap and if the new netbooks are that powerful, why not just get a full copy of Windows 7 on it?The lower versions have restrictions on how many apps you can run and the ram limits are a pain. If 7 is such a good runner on low powered applications, I would just run the full version.Buy it with Linux for cheap and stick Windows 7 on it later.Am I missing something? |
|
tengeta
on May 25, 2009 5:58 PM |
Guess my eeePC won't be a netbook when I upgrade it to 2GB ram.Does that mean I can sell it as a notebook on ebay and make twice as much as a paid for it? Finally, Microsoft style profits for the average man! |
|
Von Riff
on May 25, 2009 7:36 PM |
if 70% of the world population are "unknowledgeable" on OS n suchi think microsoft wont have a problem selling the cheapskate W7but if its the other way around, microsoft is pretty much looking at a failsure strategy theresince all the educated one's majority of them will live on P2P and torrent for their copies |
Most Popular
| Trending | Featured |
-
iOS 5.1.1 untethered jailbreak tool released, supports 4S, iPad 3
-
After five days, Facebook ranks as worst IPO flop of the decade
-
Rumor: Windows 8 RC will launch June 1, will ship with Adobe Flash
-
Rumor: AMD "Piledriver" FX CPU production to begin Q3 2012
-
Diablo III becomes the fastest-selling PC game in history
Editors' PC Game Picks
Subscribe to TechSpot
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and tech breaking news.