GPU-z reported my clock was set at 400 MHz already. I should've listened to it, but instead I read this misinformation (below) from the site, and downloaded / installed it anyway, just to see no change (400 MHz -> 400 Mhz = 0% gain). Now I wasted time both downloading/installing/uninstalling, AND making this post. Thanks GMABooster! ;-)

"Q.: On my laptop a popular diagnostic utility GPU-Z reports that I already have GMA 950 running at a speed of 400 MHz. Do I still need the GMABooster?

A.: Well, GPU-Z detects GMA 950, but does not read its actual clock. This is a known issue. Please note that there are no devices built on Intel® 945GM/GME/GMS/GSE or 943/940GML/GU Express chipset which have GMA 950 running at a default clock of 400 MHz. So, an answer is: yes, the GMABooster is still needed."

Reply

I've actually been using this for a while, and I also get about a 25 % performance increase. Does anyone know why this is? Is is limited by the memory bandwidth?

To the Guest:

GPU-Z will not report any change in GPU speed. When you launch GMA Booster, it will tell you the speed your GPU is actually running at.

To see if it is actually working, you can test it with a GPU stress test, such as this

Using GMA booster, I increased my fps from 16 to 20

Reply

When I first used GMA Booster, I found it to be a miraculous utility which improved performance dramatically. What I soon discovered is it turns off "unneeded" services, services which are actually needed, to increase performance. The result was having to go to Admin in the Control Panel and reset over 20 services. Maybe the program has changed, but I wouldn't recommend it to any user.

Reply

Man, what are you talking about? I've been using this program since April or so, and it never touched even a single service. All is does is reprograms the PLL, allowing higher graphics core clock. I play Sims 3 and Trackmania on my old Macbook, and I can confirm that the performance boost IS there. Isn't it clear that avg. 30% of extra FPS cannot be achieved by shutting down the services? Furthermore, in 3DMark 2006 the raw GPU performance is 86% higher, that's not only my observation, e.g. see the following old review http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/2750/gmabooster_improving_
ntel_gma_igp_netbook_performance/index.html

Reply

this piece of software seems interesting,nice for all those integrated ones!

Reply