Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
AMD's six-core Thuban to have feature like Turbo Boost?
Google to launch Twitter-like service for Gmail
Intel Core i5-based MacBook Pros coming soon?
Intel unveils Itanium 9300 series enterprise processors
Netflix to roll out 1080p streaming later this year
China closes major hacker ring, arrests three members
Sharp and Samsung end LCD patent suits with cross-licensing agreement
The Web
Twitter to roll out paid business accounts next year
Twitter's goal to become a money-generating enterprise is one step closer to completion. The company's co-founder, Biz Stone, said the service would begin to offer paid services for companies starting next year, granting subscribers access to unique services in exchange for their money. Stone went on to say businesses will not be obligated to begin paying for Twitter use, but the "special" services will be more than worth it. Unique tools like statistics and feedback would help large companies get an idea of just how effective Twitter is for advertising or customer communication purposes.
Stone cited potential uses for the planned paid services, such as airlines being able to analyze data from customers who subscribe to their Twitter feeds. In addition to those paid services, Twitter also has plans to begin licensing their content and streams to other websites, opening doors to work with news or media agencies down the road. Stone envisions news agencies using live Twitter feeds as part of their newsgathering, something that may be of use to a world where real-time news has substantial value.
Generating money isn't the only problem Twitter faces. While the service has a substantial user base, it has dealt with customer bleed from the beginning. The user retention issues do not help the claim by some, such as Nielsen, that the service is just a passing fad. Twitter also deals with a negative reputation in the workplace, where many businesses see it as a waste of time. It may be difficult to convince a company that it is a service worth paying for if it's something commonly banned in the workplace to begin with.
If Twitter can solve those concerns and manage to begin selling paid accounts, they might be able to convince the world, as well as their investors, that they can overcome their financial difficulties and questions over value. From an outside perspective, it seems to me that Twitter is still a dangerous prospect. People may lose interest, and without an audience, Twitter will not survive.
Stone cited potential uses for the planned paid services, such as airlines being able to analyze data from customers who subscribe to their Twitter feeds. In addition to those paid services, Twitter also has plans to begin licensing their content and streams to other websites, opening doors to work with news or media agencies down the road. Stone envisions news agencies using live Twitter feeds as part of their newsgathering, something that may be of use to a world where real-time news has substantial value.
Generating money isn't the only problem Twitter faces. While the service has a substantial user base, it has dealt with customer bleed from the beginning. The user retention issues do not help the claim by some, such as Nielsen, that the service is just a passing fad. Twitter also deals with a negative reputation in the workplace, where many businesses see it as a waste of time. It may be difficult to convince a company that it is a service worth paying for if it's something commonly banned in the workplace to begin with.
If Twitter can solve those concerns and manage to begin selling paid accounts, they might be able to convince the world, as well as their investors, that they can overcome their financial difficulties and questions over value. From an outside perspective, it seems to me that Twitter is still a dangerous prospect. People may lose interest, and without an audience, Twitter will not survive.
Related Stories
User Comments (14)
Post a comment| xclusiveitalian on November 24, 2009 7:02 PM | Twitter is looking to make some big money on the big popularity of its service, I don't even use twitter and its free. |
| matchu on November 24, 2009 8:56 PM | Twitter is so cluttered. Why would anyone want to make that worse by subscribing to an airline's account? You'd get so much junk on your home page... |
| saintbodhisatva on November 25, 2009 12:05 AM | ...Stone envisions news agencies using live Twitter
feeds as part of their newsgathering, something that may be
of use to a world where real-time news has substantial
value. This could work, but tweets may be to short
for it, which makes it prone to miscommunication and
misinterpretation, especially if the news context is of
critical importance
|
| Puiu on November 25, 2009 12:48 AM | I rarely use websites like twitter, facebook, myspace or other sites like that. I tried to use them more often but i quickly grew bored and stopped using them. But do visit websites that show funny pictures that users upload there. Why do people feel the need to make a fool of themselves on the internet by uploading stupid things under their real name? |
| Nirkon on November 25, 2009 1:53 AM | I'm glad to see twitter has found a way to make itself
profitable, I just hope they are not stepping on any user privacy lines with these 'special tools' and statistics. |
| BlindObject on November 25, 2009 1:57 AM | I really don't understand how twitter got so popular... |
| yorro on November 25, 2009 5:27 AM | The so called "special" statistics ain't that attractive, yet. |
| lightheart on November 25, 2009 7:18 AM | I don't use Twitter and I have never quite understood it's appeal. You can write a short blurb of text instantly, so what. In most cases that text is meaningless and in many cases it's a link to a web site; why not just go to the web site to begin with. |
| BlackIrish on November 25, 2009 7:25 AM | It must be Microsoft trying to sabotage Apple by paying the
delivery company to "drop" the boxes prior to delivery
:p In any case, this will decrease the revenue from the Apple Tax, which is by all means good |
| swilllx2p on November 25, 2009 8:00 AM | Yeah, I to see twitter as just a fad that will pass with time. I like many others really never saw the big appeal in twitter in the first place. Many other sites already had more functionality than Twitter, If i owned it I would of tried to sell it while it was at its peak. |
| levar on November 25, 2009 11:45 AM | BlindObject said: I'm trying to figure that
out too, I don't remember in 08' when I signed up for
twitter, it was just a site to send updates to ur friends,
then it evolved into more got so popular companies are
willing to pay up just for a name, celebrities come in now
they brought in verified accounts, competitions are the next
thing very popular, trends, everyone just started using
after that I don't get it..... seriously speaking if they
can actually solve those concerns idk, you might never know
you might just be looking at tiwtter updates going across
the tv screen lol
I really don't understand how twitter got so popular... |
| fref on November 25, 2009 2:42 PM | @BlackIrish I think you posted that comment under the wrong story... |
| fref on November 25, 2009 2:45 PM | As long as they keep the service free for home users, I think it's a good way to increase revenue. Businesses are used to paying for that sort of thing anyway. |
| jerry53 on November 27, 2009 7:22 PM | i knew that this was coming,make something new make it famous and roll with the money.personally i dont think that twitter is very bad and i really love the fact that i can connect to famous personalities. |
TechSpot RSS



